» Articles » PMID: 23592938

Diagnostic Utility of Specific Electrocardiographical Parameters in Predicting Left Ventricular Function

Overview
Date 2013 Apr 18
PMID 23592938
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Changes in electrocardiography (ECG) parameters, including sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, bundle branch blocks, Q waves and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, are commonly observed in patients with heart failure (HF).

Objectives: To determine whether specific ECG parameters have a diagnostic role in predicting LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in patients with suspected HF.

Methods: A total of 123 patients with symptoms or signs of HF and 20 HF patients with New York Heart Association class IV status were consecutively recruited. Several ECG parameters, including QRS duration, dispersion and SV1 or SV2 + RV5 or RV6 ≥3.5 mV (Goldberger's first criterion), QRS amplitude ≤0.8 mV in the limb leads (Goldberger's second criterion) and RV4/SV4 <1 (Goldberger's third criterion), were subsequently determined and correlated with LV ejection fraction (LVEF).

Results: One hundred six patients had LVEF <50% (LVSD group), while 37 patients had LVEF ≥50% (non-LVSD group). The maximal QRS duration of the LVSD group was significantly longer than that of the non-LVSD group (124.5±20.8 ms versus 109.7±13.1 ms; P<0.001). ROC analysis revealed that a cut-off point of QRS duration ≥124 ms significantly predicted LVSD (OR 4.1 [95% CI 1.7 to 10.2]; P=0.001). The frequencies of Goldberger's first and third criteria were higher in the LVSD group (OR 8.3 [95% CI 1.9 to 36.4]; P=0.001; and OR 8.9 [95% CI 3.4 to 23.2]; P<0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that Goldberger's first and third criteria as well as QRS duration ≥124 ms were independent predictors of LVSD.

Conclusion: Bedside ECG parameters, such as the Goldberger criteria, may be useful in predicting LVSD before the use of more sophisticated diagnostic tests is considered in patients with suspected HF.

Citing Articles

The Role of Serum NT-proBNP for Predicting Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Hospitalized Patients in Sri Lanka.

Chaminda Rathnayake B, Illeperuma R, Jayasinghe S, Fawcett T, Maduwage K, Thilak Jayalath W EJIFCC. 2024; 34(4):287-296.

PMID: 38303755 PMC: 10828538.


Electrocardiogram changes as predictors for new imaging findings in repeat transthoracic echocardiography.

Kadado A, Pervaiz A, Gobeil K, Shikari S, Elder P, Battisha A Future Cardiol. 2023; 19(10):487-495.

PMID: 37721317 PMC: 10599417. DOI: 10.2217/fca-2023-0045.


Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiographic screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction and mortality risk prediction.

Huang Y, Hsu Y, Liu Z, Lin C, Tsai R, Chen J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1070641.

PMID: 36960474 PMC: 10029758. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1070641.


Validation of electrocardiographic criteria for identifying left ventricular dysfunction in patients with previous myocardial infarction.

Panicker G, Narula D, Albert C, Lee D, Kothari S, Goldberger J Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020; 26(2):e12812.

PMID: 33124739 PMC: 7935098. DOI: 10.1111/anec.12812.


Wave intensity of aortic root pressure as diagnostic marker of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Hametner B, Parragh S, Weber T, Wassertheurer S PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0179938.

PMID: 28628659 PMC: 5476286. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179938.


References
1.
Young S, Abouantoun S, Savvides M, Madsen E, Froelicher V . Limitations of electrocardiographic scoring systems for estimation of left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983; 1(6):1479-88. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80052-7. View

2.
Chinitz J, Cooper J, Verdino R . Electrocardiogram voltage discordance: interpretation of low QRS voltage only in the limb leads. J Electrocardiol. 2008; 41(4):281-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.12.001. View

3.
Chia B, Lim Y, Tan H, Yan P . Left bundle branch block and increased transverse:frontal plane QRS voltage ratio in severe left ventricular dysfunction. Int J Cardiol. 1998; 65(1):65-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5273(98)00045-x. View

4.
Ferrans V, MASSUMI R, SHUGOLL G, Ali N, Roberts W . Ultrastructural studies of myocardial biopsies in 45 patients with obstructive or congestive cardiomyopathy. Recent Adv Stud Cardiac Struct Metab. 1973; 2:231-72. View

5.
Yusuf S, Pitt B, Davis C, Hood W, Cohn J . Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(5):293-302. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199108013250501. View