» Articles » PMID: 23584771

Changes in the Rumen Epimural Bacterial Diversity of Beef Cattle As Affected by Diet and Induced Ruminal Acidosis

Overview
Date 2013 Apr 16
PMID 23584771
Citations 104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Little is known about the nature of the rumen epithelial adherent (epimural) microbiome in cattle fed different diets. Using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and pyrosequencing of the V3 hypervariable coding region of 16S rRNA, epimural bacterial communities of 8 cattle were profiled during the transition from a forage to a high-concentrate diet, during acidosis, and after recovery. A total of 153,621 high-quality gene sequences were obtained, with populations exhibiting less taxonomic variability among individuals than across diets. The bacterial community composition exhibited clustering (P < 0.03) by diet, with only 14 genera, representing >1% of the rumen epimural population, differing (P ≤ 0.05) among diets. During acidosis, levels of Atopobium, Desulfocurvus, Fervidicola, Lactobacillus, and Olsenella increased, while during the recovery, Desulfocurvus, Lactobacillus, and Olsenella reverted to levels similar to those with the high-grain diet and Sharpea and Succinivibrio reverted to levels similar to those with the forage diet. The relative abundances of bacterial populations changed during diet transition for all qPCR targets except Streptococcus spp. Less than 5% of total operational taxonomic units (OTUs) identified exhibited significant variability across diets. Based on DGGE, the community structures of epithelial populations differed (P ≤ 0.10); segregation was most prominent for the mixed forage diet versus the grain, acidotic challenge, and recovery diets. Atopobium, cc142, Lactobacillus, Olsenella, RC39, Sharpea, Solobacterium, Succiniclasticum, and Syntrophococcus were particularly prevalent during acidosis. Determining the metabolic roles of these key genera in the rumens of cattle fed high-grain diets could define a clinical microbial profile associated with ruminal acidosis.

Citing Articles

Impact of Feed Composition on Rumen Microbial Dynamics and Phenotypic Traits in Beef Cattle.

Neves A, Vieira R, Vargas-Bello-Perez E, Chen Y, McAllister T, Ominski K Microorganisms. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40005677 PMC: 11857910. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13020310.


Niacin alters ruminal microbial composition and metabolites in sheep fed a high-concentrate diet.

Cheng Z, Liu J, Yu Y, Liu W, Li X, Li F Front Vet Sci. 2025; 12:1510617.

PMID: 39936076 PMC: 11812060. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1510617.


Regulation of Milk Fat Synthesis: Key Genes and Microbial Functions.

Yu Y, Fu R, Jin C, Gao H, Han L, Fu B Microorganisms. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39597692 PMC: 11596427. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12112302.


Effect of Dietary Concentrate-to-Forage Ratios During the Cold Season on Slaughter Performance, Meat Quality, Rumen Fermentation and Gut Microbiota of Tibetan Sheep.

Wang S, Tang W, Jiang T, Wang R, Zhang R, Ou J Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39595356 PMC: 11591461. DOI: 10.3390/ani14223305.


Microbial inoculum effects on the rumen epithelial transcriptome and rumen epimural metatranscriptome in calves.

Fregulia P, Park T, Li W, Cersosimo L, Zanton G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16914.

PMID: 39043743 PMC: 11266570. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65685-y.


References
1.
Maeda H, Fujimoto C, Haruki Y, Maeda T, Kokeguchi S, Petelin M . Quantitative real-time PCR using TaqMan and SYBR Green for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, tetQ gene and total bacteria. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003; 39(1):81-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00224-4. View

2.
Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier J, Krause D . Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75(22):7115-24. PMC: 2786511. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00739-09. View

3.
Sadet S, Martin C, Meunier B, Morgavi D . PCR-DGGE analysis reveals a distinct diversity in the bacterial population attached to the rumen epithelium. Animal. 2012; 1(7):939-44. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731107000304. View

4.
McCowan R, Cheng K, BAILEY C, Costerton J . Adhesion of bacteria to epithelial cell surfaces within the reticulo-rumen of cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978; 35(1):149-55. PMC: 242795. DOI: 10.1128/aem.35.1.149-155.1978. View

5.
Li M, Penner G, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Oba M, Guan L . Effects of sampling location and time, and host animal on assessment of bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in the bovine rumen. J Appl Microbiol. 2009; 107(6):1924-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04376.x. View