The Effects of Workplace Stressors on Muscle Activity in the Neck-shoulder and Forearm Muscles During Computer Work: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal Eur J Appl Physiol

Specialty Physiology

Date 2013 Apr 16

PMID 23584278

Citations 18

Authors

B H W Eijckelhof

M A Huysmans

J L Bruno Garza

B M Blatter

J H van Dieen

J T Dennerlein

A J van der Beek

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Workplace stressors have been indicated to play a role in the development of neck and upper extremity pain possibly through an increase of sustained (low-level) muscle activity. The aim of this review was to study the effects of workplace stressors on muscle activity in the neck-shoulder and forearm muscles. An additional aim was to find out whether the muscles of the neck-shoulder and the forearm are affected differently by different types of workplace stressors. A systematic literature search was conducted on studies investigating the relation between simulated or realistic workplace stressors and neck-shoulder and forearm muscle activity. For studies meeting the inclusion criteria, a risk of bias assessment was performed and data were extracted for synthesis. Results were pooled when possible and otherwise described. Twenty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting data of 25 different studies. Except for one field study, all included studies were laboratory studies. Data of 19 articles could be included in the meta-analysis and revealed a statistically significant, medium increase in neck-shoulder and forearm muscle activity as a result of workplace stressors. In subgroup analyses, we found an equal effect of different stressor types (i.e. cognitive/emotional stress, work pace, and precision) on muscle activity in both body regions. In conclusion, simulated workplace stressors result in an increase in neck-shoulder and forearm muscle activity. No indications were found that different types of stressors affect these body regions differently. These conclusions are fully based on laboratory studies, since field studies on this topic are currently lacking.

Citing Articles

Central mechanisms of muscle tone regulation: implications for pain and performance.

Cacciatore T, Anderson D, Cohen R Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1511783.

PMID: 39717699 PMC: 11665217. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1511783.

The effects of a 12-week combined motor control exercise and isolated lumbar extension intervention on lumbar multifidus muscle stiffness in individuals with chronic low back pain.

Tornblom A, Naghdi N, Rye M, Montpetit C, Fortin M Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1336544.

PMID: 39258113 PMC: 11385609. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1336544.

Musculoskeletal demands in microsurgery-an explorative study comparing the ergonomics of microscope and 3D exoscope.

Steinhilber B, Conte L, Seibt R, Herlan S, Tatagiba M, Ebner F Neurosurg Rev. 2023; 46(1):164.

PMID: 37402848 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02076-3.

Exploration of Emotion Dynamics Sensing Using Trapezius EMG and Fingertip Temperature.

Sato W, Kochiyama T Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(17).

PMID: 36081011 PMC: 9460856. DOI: 10.3390/s22176553.

Do psychosocial factors mediate the appearance of musculoskeletal symptoms? Evidence of an empirical study about the role of mental workload in computer workers.

Soria-Oliver M, Lopez J, Torrano F, Garcia-Gonzalez G PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0252179.

PMID: 34138890 PMC: 8211229. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252179.

References

Laursen B, Jensen B, Garde A, Jorgensen A . Effect of mental and physical demands on muscular activity during the use of a computer mouse and a keyboard. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002; 28(4):215-21. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.668. View

Laursen B, Jensen B, Ratkevicius A . Performance and muscle activity during computer mouse tasks in young and elderly adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001; 84(4):329-36. DOI: 10.1007/s004210000367. View

Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B . The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998; 3(4):322-55. DOI: 10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.322. View

Waersted M, Bjorklund R, Westgaard R . Shoulder muscle tension induced by two VDU-based tasks of different complexity. Ergonomics. 1991; 34(2):137-50. DOI: 10.1080/00140139108967302. View

Finsen L, Sogaard K, Jensen C, Borg V, Christensen H . Muscle activity and cardiovascular response during computer-mouse work with and without memory demands. Ergonomics. 2002; 44(14):1312-29. DOI: 10.1080/00140130110099065. View

Leyman E, Mirka G, Kaber D, Sommerich C . Cervicobrachial muscle response to cognitive load in a dual-task scenario. Ergonomics. 2004; 47(6):625-45. DOI: 10.1080/00140130310001629766. View

Wahlstrom J, Hagberg M, Johnson P, Svensson J, Rempel D . Influence of time pressure and verbal provocation on physiological and psychological reactions during work with a computer mouse. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002; 87(3):257-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0611-7. View

Finsen L, Sogaard K, Christensen H . Influence of memory demand and contra lateral activity on muscle activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001; 11(5):373-80. DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(01)00015-3. View

Westgard R, Jensen C, Nilsen K . Muscle coordination and choice-reaction time tests as indicators of occupational muscle load and shoulder-neck complaints. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993; 67(2):106-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF00376652. View

10.

Blangsted A, Sogaard K, Christensen H, Sjogaard G . The effect of physical and psychosocial loads on the trapezius muscle activity during computer keying tasks and rest periods. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003; 91(2-3):253-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0979-z. View

11.

Waersted M, Bjorklund R, Westgaard R . The effect of motivation on shoulder-muscle tension in attention-demanding tasks. Ergonomics. 1994; 37(2):363-76. DOI: 10.1080/00140139408963652. View

12.

Szeto G, Lin J . A study of forearm muscle activity and wrist kinematics in symptomatic office workers performing mouse-clicking tasks with different precision and speed demands. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 21(1):59-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.06.006. View

13.

Westad C, Mork P, Westgaard R . Firing patterns of low-threshold trapezius motor units in feedback-controlled contractions and vocational motor activities. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 158(4):465-73. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1925-y. View

14.

Sandfeld J, Jensen B . Effect of computer mouse gain and visual demand on mouse clicking performance and muscle activation in a young and elderly group of experienced computer users. Appl Ergon. 2005; 36(5):547-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.03.003. View

15.

Harrington C, Feuerstein M . Workstyle in office workers: ergonomic and psychological reactivity to work demands. J Occup Environ Med. 2010; 52(4):375-82. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181d5e51d. View

16.

Wang Y, Szeto G, Chan C . Effects of physical and mental task demands on cervical and upper limb muscle activity and physiological responses during computer tasks and recovery periods. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011; 111(11):2791-803. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-1908-1. View

17.

Duval S, Tweedie R . Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000; 56(2):455-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x. View

18.

IJmker S, Huysmans M, Blatter B, van der Beek A, van Mechelen W, Bongers P . Should office workers spend fewer hours at their computer? A systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med. 2006; 64(4):211-22. PMC: 2078461. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.026468. View

19.

Bongers P, Kremer A, ter Laak J . Are psychosocial factors, risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder, elbow, or hand/wrist?: A review of the epidemiological literature. Am J Ind Med. 2002; 41(5):315-42. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10050. View

20.

Westgaard R, Bonato P, Westad C . Respiratory and stress-induced activation of low-threshold motor units in the human trapezius muscle. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 175(4):689-701. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0587-3. View