» Articles » PMID: 23583433

Eluxadoline Benefits Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea in a Phase 2 Study

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2013 Apr 16
PMID 23583433
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Aims: Simultaneous agonism of the μ-opioid receptor and antagonism of the δ-opioid receptor can reduce abdominal pain and diarrhea in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) without constipating side effects. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a minimally absorbed, μ-opioid receptor agonist and δ-opioid receptor antagonist (eluxadoline) in a phase 2 study in patients with IBS-D.

Methods: We randomly assigned 807 patients to groups that received oral placebo twice daily or 5, 25, 100, or 200 mg oral eluxadoline for 12 weeks. The primary end point was clinical response at week 4, defined by a mean reduction in daily pain score from baseline of ≥ 30%, and of at least 2 points on 0-10 scale, as well as a stool consistency score of 3 or 4 on the Bristol Stool Scale (1-7) for at least 66% of daily diary entries during that week.

Results: Significantly more patients receiving 25 mg (12.0%) or 200 mg (13.8%) eluxadoline met the primary end point of clinical response than patients given placebo (5.7%; P < .05). Patients receiving eluxadoline at 100 mg and 200 mg also had greater improvements in bowel movement frequency and urgency, global symptoms, quality of life, and adequate relief assessments (P < .05). Additionally, patients receiving 100 mg (28.0%) or 200 mg (28.5%) eluxadoline were significantly more likely than those receiving placebo (13.8%; P < .005) to meet the US Food and Drug Administration response end point during the full 12 weeks of the study. Eluxadoline was well tolerated with a low incidence of constipation.

Conclusions: In a phase 2 study of the mixed μ-opioid receptor agonist/δ-opioid receptor antagonist eluxadoline vs placebo in patients with IBS-D, patients given eluxadoline were significantly more likely to be clinical responders, based on a composite of improvement in abdominal pain and stool consistency. Further study of eluxadoline is warranted to assess its potential as a treatment for IBS-D.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for drug-related acute pancreatitis: an analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Zhang L, Mao W, Liu D, Hu B, Lin X, Ran J Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1231320.

PMID: 38044938 PMC: 10690789. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1231320.


New Developments in Bile Acid Diarrhea.

Camilleri M, BouSaba J Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2023; 19(9):520-537.

PMID: 37771793 PMC: 10524409.


Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Using Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Step Forward?.

Camilleri M, Dilmaghani S Gastroenterology. 2022; 163(4):815-817.

PMID: 35809615 PMC: 9885897. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.087.


Double-blinded randomised placebo controlled trial of enterosgel (polymethylsiloxane polyhydrate) for the treatment of IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D).

Howell C, Kemppinen A, Allgar V, Dodd M, Knowles C, Mclaughlin J Gut. 2022; 71(12):2430-2438.

PMID: 35760493 PMC: 9664110. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327293.


Eluxadoline Versus Antispasmodics in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Adjusted Indirect Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis.

Qin D, Tao Q, Huang S, Chen M, Zheng H Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:757969.

PMID: 35281934 PMC: 8906885. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.757969.