» Articles » PMID: 23582712

Loss of Benefit in VIM Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Essential Tremor (ET): How Prevalent is It?

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Apr 16
PMID 23582712
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ventralis intermedius (Vim) thalamic deep brain stimulation for medication-refractory essential tremor (ET) has been shown to significantly improve severity of limb tremor in several large case series with significant reduction in objective motor scores. A variable proportion of patients experience decline in benefit over time, however, most studies have not been designed to describe the phenomenon of waning benefit in terms that are helpful for patient counseling. In this retrospective single center study, we define waning benefit as a phenomenon that occurs after patients begin to require reprogramming visits to optimize DBS benefit on tremor. We employed a survival analysis with time to escape (TTE) as a quantitative measure of time elapsed between implantation and the need for subsequent reprogramming. In our cohort of ET patients operated on with Vim DBS from 1994 to 2009, among 45 subjects who met inclusion criteria, 73% reported waning benefit at some point during a mean follow-up period of 56 months (range 12-152 months). The mean TTE from implantation date was 18 months (range 3-75 months). We conclude that loss of benefit over time from Vim DBS for ET is more prevalent than previously published estimates have indicated and should be discussed during patient counseling regarding durability of expected benefit. In addition, this data suggests that a disease-based explanation rather than technical factors are more likely to explain the decline in benefit.

Citing Articles

Potential of Individual Upper-Limb Muscles to Contribute to Postural Tremor: Simulations From Neural Drive to Joint Rotation.

Baker S, Beutler L, Free D, Farina D, Charles S Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2025; 15:7.

PMID: 40027118 PMC: 11869822. DOI: 10.5334/tohm.949.


Rebound Tremor Frequency as a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Delayed Therapy Escape after Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor-Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study.

Frommer M, Walz I, Aiple F, Schroter N, Maurer C, Rijntjes M Brain Sci. 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39061408 PMC: 11274735. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14070667.


Deep Brain Stimulation for Orthostatic Tremor: An Observational Study.

Babeliowsky W, Bot M, Potters W, van den Munckhof P, Blok E, de Bie R Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024; 11(6):676-685.

PMID: 38586984 PMC: 11145120. DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.14035.


Management of essential tremor deep brain stimulation-induced side effects.

Martinez-Nunez A, Sarmento F, Chandra V, Hess C, Hilliard J, Okun M Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1353150.

PMID: 38454907 PMC: 10918853. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1353150.


The role of the motor thalamus in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.

Neudorfer C, Kultas-Ilinsky K, Ilinsky I, Paschen S, Helmers A, Cosgrove G Neurotherapeutics. 2024; 21(3):e00313.

PMID: 38195310 PMC: 11103222. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2023.e00313.