» Articles » PMID: 23580700

Smokeless and Dual Tobacco Use Among Males Surviving Childhood Cancer: a Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Abstract

Cancer survivors experience treatment-related complications that can be exacerbated by tobacco use. This study reports the prevalence of smokeless and dual tobacco use, compares these rates to the U.S. population, and examines tobacco risk factors among males surviving childhood cancer. Data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) 2007 survey were used (N = 3378). Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were obtained by comparing CCSS data with the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between risk factors and tobacco use. Among male survivors, 8.3% and 2.3% were current smokeless tobacco and dual tobacco users, respectively. Survivors were less likely than population males to report smokeless tobacco [SIR = 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-0.72) or dual tobacco (SIR = 0.37; CI, 0.29-0.46) use; however, non-White survivors aged 35 to 49 years were more likely to use smokeless tobacco (SIR = 2.32; CI, 1.27-3.90). Smokeless tobacco use was associated (P < 0.05) with younger age at diagnosis, lower education, being married or divorced/separated, and not living in the Northeastern United State, whereas history of cardiovascular- and/or pulmonary-toxic treatment was protective. Dual tobacco use was associated with younger age at diagnosis, lower education, divorce/separation, and high psychologic distress. Having active heart or circulatory conditions was protective. Although smokeless tobacco/dual tobacco use is generally low among childhood cancer survivors, these findings suggest that tobacco use screening should be expanded to include smokeless tobacco use, and that smokeless tobacco-specific education and cessation interventions should be provided to users. Screening and intervening for smokeless tobacco/dual tobacco use in childhood cancer survivors will reduce tobacco-related morbidity and mortality.

Citing Articles

Childhood cancer survival in the highly vulnerable population of South Texas: A cohort study.

Wu S, Liu Y, Williams M, Aguilar C, Ramirez A, Mesa R PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0278354.

PMID: 37022991 PMC: 10079030. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278354.


Systematic Review of Substance Use Measurement Tools in Adolescent and Young Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors.

Chardon M, Beal S, Breen G, McGrady M J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2021; 11(4):333-345.

PMID: 34550793 PMC: 9464089. DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0086.


The State of the Science on Cancer Diagnosis as a "Teachable Moment" for Smoking Cessation: A Scoping Review.

Puleo G, Borger T, Bowling W, Burris J Nicotine Tob Res. 2021; 24(2):160-168.

PMID: 34212198 PMC: 8807170. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab139.


Late effects in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the context of selected gene polymorphisms.

Kwiecinska K, Strojny W, Pietrys D, Bik-Multanowski M, Siedlar M, Balwierz W Ital J Pediatr. 2018; 44(1):92.

PMID: 30111348 PMC: 6094582. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-018-0526-5.


Psychological Symptoms, Social Outcomes, Socioeconomic Attainment, and Health Behaviors Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Current State of the Literature.

Brinkman T, Recklitis C, Michel G, Grootenhuis M, Klosky J J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(21):2190-2197.

PMID: 29874134 PMC: 6053297. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5552.


References
1.
Klosky J, Tyc V, Garces-Webb D, Buscemi J, Klesges R, Hudson M . Emerging issues in smoking among adolescent and adult cancer survivors: a comprehensive review. Cancer. 2007; 110(11):2408-19. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23061. View

2.
Velicer W, Prochaska J, Rossi J, Snow M . Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. Psychol Bull. 1992; 111(1):23-41. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.23. View

3.
Oeffinger K, Mertens A, Sklar C, Kawashima T, Hudson M, Meadows A . Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(15):1572-82. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa060185. View

4.
Clarke S, Eiser C . Health behaviours in childhood cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2007; 43(9):1373-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.03.002. View

5.
Pampel F . Differences in the influence of family background and social activities on smoking of minority and white high school seniors, 1976-2004. J Immigr Minor Health. 2008; 10(6):507-15. PMC: 2735563. DOI: 10.1007/s10903-008-9139-1. View