The Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism in New Zealand Giant Moa (Dinornis) and Other Ratites

Overview

Journal Proc Biol Sci

Specialty Biology

Date 2013 Apr 12

PMID 23576789

Citations 7

Authors

Valerie A Olson

Samuel T Turvey

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The extinct giant moa Dinornis is one of the most remarkable known examples of reversed sexual size dimorphism (RSD), with males weighing 34-85 kg, but females weighing up to 240 kg. However, there has been little consideration of the evolutionary mechanism that produced this level of dimorphism, and most living palaeognaths also exhibit varying levels of RSD. Using male and female body mass data for extant ratites and tinamous and four extinct moa genera, and tests of phylogenetic dependence (λ) of body size evolution among these species, we investigated whether Dinornis was truly unusual with respect to RSD relative to other palaeognaths, which sex was under greater pressure to change in size over evolutionary time, and which candidate hypotheses explaining the presence and variability of RSD in the genus are most plausible. We demonstrate that the extreme level of RSD exhibited by Dinornis represents a straightforward consequence of positive allometric scaling of body size. However, Dinornis females have undergone more evolutionary change than males, and larger females from high-productivity environments are associated with greater differentiation, possibly driven by intraspecific competition and female-biased selection for increased offspring investment.

Citing Articles

The moa footprints from the Pliocene - early Pleistocene of Kyeburn, Otago, New Zealand.

Fleury K, Burns E, Richards M, Norton K, Read S, Wesley R J R Soc N Z. 2024; 54(5):620-642.

PMID: 39440283 PMC: 11459810. DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2023.2264789.

A nuclear genome assembly of an extinct flightless bird, the little bush moa.

Edwards S, Cloutier A, Cockburn G, Driver R, Grayson P, Katoh K Sci Adv. 2024; 10(21):eadj6823.

PMID: 38781323 PMC: 11809649. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj6823.

Femora from an exceptionally large population of coeval ornithomimosaurs yield evidence of sexual dimorphism in extinct theropod dinosaurs.

Pintore R, Cornette R, Houssaye A, Allain R Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37309177 PMC: 10264075. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.83413.

Intraspecific variation and directional casque asymmetry in adult southern cassowaries (Casuarius casuarius).

Green T, Kay D, Gignac P J Anat. 2022; 241(4):951-965.

PMID: 35933695 PMC: 9482693. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13733.

Maniraptoran pelvic musculature highlights evolutionary patterns in theropod locomotion on the line to birds.

Rhodes M, Henderson D, Currie P PeerJ. 2021; 9:e10855.

PMID: 33717681 PMC: 7937347. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10855.

References

Bertelli S, Giannini N, Goloboff P . A phylogeny of the tinamous (aves: palaeognathiformes) based on integumentary characters. Syst Biol. 2003; 51(6):959-79. DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102492. View

Turvey S, Green O, Holdaway R . Cortical growth marks reveal extended juvenile development in New Zealand moa. Nature. 2005; 435(7044):940-3. DOI: 10.1038/nature03635. View

Arak A . SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BODY SIZE: A MODEL AND A TEST. Evolution. 2017; 42(4):820-825. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02501.x. View

Huynen L, Millar C, Scofield R, Lambert D . Nuclear DNA sequences detect species limits in ancient moa. Nature. 2003; 425(6954):175-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature01838. View

Chojnowski J, Kimball R, Braun E . Introns outperform exons in analyses of basal avian phylogeny using clathrin heavy chain genes. Gene. 2008; 410(1):89-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.11.016. View

Baker A, Huynen L, Haddrath O, Millar C, Lambert D . Reconstructing the tempo and mode of evolution in an extinct clade of birds with ancient DNA: the giant moas of New Zealand. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(23):8257-62. PMC: 1149408. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409435102. View

Massemin S, Korpimaki E, Wiehn J . Reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors: evaluation of the hypotheses in kestrels breeding in a temporally changing environment. Oecologia. 2017; 124(1):26-32. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050021. View

Dale J, Dunn P, Figuerola J, Lislevand T, Szekely T, Whittingham L . Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1628):2971-9. PMC: 2211517. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1043. View

Bourdon E, Castanet J, de Ricqles A, Scofield P, Tennyson A, Lamrous H . Bone growth marks reveal protracted growth in New Zealand kiwi (Aves, Apterygidae). Biol Lett. 2009; 5(5):639-42. PMC: 2781955. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0310. View

10.

Phillips M, Gibb G, Crimp E, Penny D . Tinamous and moa flock together: mitochondrial genome sequence analysis reveals independent losses of flight among ratites. Syst Biol. 2010; 59(1):90-107. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp079. View

11.

Freckleton R, Harvey P, Pagel M . Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat. 2008; 160(6):712-26. DOI: 10.1086/343873. View

12.

Harshman J, Braun E, Braun M, Huddleston C, Bowie R, Chojnowski J . Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(36):13462-7. PMC: 2533212. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803242105. View

13.

Bunce M, Worthy T, Ford T, Hoppitt W, Willerslev E, Drummond A . Extreme reversed sexual size dimorphism in the extinct New Zealand moa Dinornis. Nature. 2003; 425(6954):172-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature01871. View

14.

Szekely T, Freckleton R, Reynolds J . Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(33):12224-7. PMC: 514460. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0404503101. View

15.

Haddrath O, Baker A . Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences of extinct birds: ratite phylogenetics and the vicariance biogeography hypothesis. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1470):939-45. PMC: 1088691. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1587. View

16.

Bunce M, Worthy T, Phillips M, Holdaway R, Willerslev E, Haile J . The evolutionary history of the extinct ratite moa and New Zealand Neogene paleogeography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(49):20646-51. PMC: 2791642. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906660106. View

17.

Hedrick A, Temeles E . The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: Hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 4(5):136-8. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90212-7. View

18.

Cooper A, Lalueza-Fox C, Anderson S, Rambaut A, Austin J, WARD R . Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two extinct moas clarify ratite evolution. Nature. 2001; 409(6821):704-7. DOI: 10.1038/35055536. View

19.

Smith R . Statistics of sexual size dimorphism. J Hum Evol. 1999; 36(4):423-58. DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1998.0281. View