» Articles » PMID: 23575993

Hyperpolarized [1-13C]dehydroascorbate MR Spectroscopy in a Murine Model of Prostate Cancer: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET

Overview
Journal J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2013 Apr 12
PMID 23575993
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Reduction and oxidation (redox) chemistry is increasingly implicated in cancer pathogenesis. To interrogate the redox status of prostate tumors noninvasively, we developed hyperpolarized [1-(13)C]dehydroascorbate ((13)C-DHA), the oxidized form of vitamin C, as an MR probe. In a model of transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP), increased reduction of hyperpolarized (13)C-DHA to vitamin C was observed in tumor, as compared with normal prostate and surrounding benign tissue. We hypothesized that this difference was due to higher concentrations of glutathione and increased transport of hyperpolarized (13)C-DHA via the glucose transporters (GLUT1, GLUT3, and GLUT4) in TRAMP tumor. To test these hypotheses, hyperpolarized (13)C-DHA MR spectroscopy (MRS) and (18)F-FDG PET were applied as complementary technologies in the TRAMP model.

Methods: Late-stage TRAMP tumors (>4 cm(3)) were studied at similar time points (MR studies conducted < 24 h after PET) in fasting mice by (18)F-FDG PET and hyperpolarized (13)C-DHA MR imaging on a small-animal PET/CT scanner and a (1)H/(3)C 3-T MR scanner. PET data were processed using open-source AMIDE software to compare the standardized uptake values of tumor with those of surrounding muscle, and (13)C-DHA MRS data were processed using custom software to compare the metabolite ratios (vitamin C/[vitamin C + (13)C-DHA]). After in vivo studies, the tumor glutathione concentrations were determined using a spectrophotometric assay, and thiol staining was performed using mercury orange. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to evaluate the relevant transporters GLUT1, GLUT3, and GLUT4 and vitamin C transporters SVCT1 and SVCT2. GLUT1 was also evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

Results: The average metabolite ratio was 0.28 ± 0.02 in TRAMP tumor, versus 0.11 ± 0.02 in surrounding benign tissue (n = 4), representing a 2.5-fold difference. The corresponding tumor-to-nontumor (18)F-FDG uptake ratio was 3.0. The total glutathione was 5.1 ± 0.4 mM in tumor and 1.0 ± 0.2 mM in normal prostate, whereas reduced glutathione was 2.0 ± 0.3 mM and 0.8 ± 0.3 mM, respectively, corresponding to a 2.5-fold difference. In TRAMP tumor, mercury orange staining demonstrated increased thiols. Real-time polymerase chain reaction showed no significant difference in GLUT1 messenger RNA between TRAMP tumor and normal prostate, with immunohistochemistry (anti-GLUT1) also showing comparable staining.

Conclusion: Both hyperpolarized (13)C-DHA and (18)F-FDG provide similar tumor contrast in the TRAMP model. Our findings suggest that the mechanism of in vivo hyperpolarized (13)C-DHA reduction and the resulting tumor contrast correlates most strongly with glutathione concentration. In the TRAMP model, GLUT1 is not significantly upregulated and is unlikely to account for the contrast obtained using hyperpolarized (13)C-DHA or (18)F-FDG.

Citing Articles

Co-Polarized [1-C]Pyruvate and [1,3-C]Acetoacetate Provide a Simultaneous View of Cytosolic and Mitochondrial Redox in a Single Experiment.

Sharma G, Wen X, Maptue N, Hever T, Malloy C, Sherry A ACS Sens. 2021; 6(11):3967-3977.

PMID: 34761912 PMC: 8908480. DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.1c01225.


Hypoxia Imaging As a Guide for Hypoxia-Modulated and Hypoxia-Activated Therapy.

Brender J, Saida Y, Devasahayam N, Krishna M, Kishimoto S Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021; 36(1-3):144-159.

PMID: 34428981 PMC: 8856011. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2021.0176.


Hyperpolarized C Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Tool for Imaging Tissue Redox State, Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Cellular Metabolism.

Stewart N, Sato T, Takeda N, Hirata H, Matsumoto S Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021; 36(1-3):81-94.

PMID: 34218688 PMC: 8792501. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2021.0139.


Nitroxyl Radical as a Theranostic Contrast Agent in Magnetic Resonance Redox Imaging.

Matsumoto K, Nakanishi I, Zhelev Z, Bakalova R, Aoki I Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021; 36(1-3):95-121.

PMID: 34148403 PMC: 8792502. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2021.0110.


Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance and Artificial Intelligence: Frontiers of Imaging in Pancreatic Cancer.

Enriquez J, Chu Y, Pudakalakatti S, Hsieh K, Salmon D, Dutta P JMIR Med Inform. 2021; 9(6):e26601.

PMID: 34137725 PMC: 8277399. DOI: 10.2196/26601.


References
1.
Vukovic V, Nicklee T, Hedley D . Microregional heterogeneity of non-protein thiols in cervical carcinomas assessed by combined use of HPLC and fluorescence image analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2000; 6(5):1826-32. View

2.
Guzman M, Li X, Corbett C, Rossi R, Bushnell T, Liesveld J . Rapid and selective death of leukemia stem and progenitor cells induced by the compound 4-benzyl, 2-methyl, 1,2,4-thiadiazolidine, 3,5 dione (TDZD-8). Blood. 2007; 110(13):4436-44. PMC: 2234782. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-088815. View

3.
Lu J, Monardo L, Bryskin I, Hou Z, Trachtenberg J, Wilson B . Androgens induce oxidative stress and radiation resistance in prostate cancer cells though NADPH oxidase. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2009; 13(1):39-46. PMC: 2834342. DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2009.24. View

4.
Reinicke K, Sotomayor P, Cisterna P, Delgado C, Nualart F, Godoy A . Cellular distribution of Glut-1 and Glut-5 in benign and malignant human prostate tissue. J Cell Biochem. 2011; 113(2):553-62. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.23379. View

5.
Al-Mamgani A, Lebesque J, Heemsbergen W, Tans L, Kirkels W, Levendag P . Controversies in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer--what is the optimal combination of hormonal therapy and radiotherapy: a review of literature. Prostate. 2009; 70(7):701-9. DOI: 10.1002/pros.21102. View