» Articles » PMID: 23569356

A Study of Static, Kinetic, and Dynamic Visual Acuity in 102 Japanese Professional Baseball Players

Overview
Journal Clin Ophthalmol
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2013 Apr 10
PMID 23569356
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It seemed that visual functions might have some effects on the performance of baseball players. We measured static, kinetic, and dynamic visual acuity (SVA, KVA, and DVA, respectively) of Japanese professional baseball players to ascertain whether there would be any difference in SVA, KVA, and DVA among player groups stratified according to their performance level.

Methods: The subjects were 102 male professional baseball players with a mean age of 26 years who were members of a Japanese professional baseball club from 2000 to 2009. They were stratified into three groups according to their performance level: A (players who were on the roster of the top-level team all the time throughout the study period), B (players who were on the roster of the top-level team sometimes but not all the time), and C (players who were never on the roster of the top-level team). They were interviewed for the use of corrective visual aids, and examined for SVA, KVA, and DVA. The measurements of these parameters were compared among groups A, B, and C. We also investigated and analyzed the association of KVA or DVA with player position (pitchers or fielders) and with hand dominance for batting. KVA was compared between the pitchers and the fielders because they each require different playing skills. DVA was compared between the right-handed and the left-handed batters.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference among groups A, B, and C. There was a statistically significant difference in KVA between the pitchers and the fielders (t-test; P < 0.05) There was no statistically significant difference in DVA between the right-handed and the left-handed batters.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the examined visual functions among player groups with different performance levels.

Citing Articles

The impact of physical exercise with additional visual tasks on UDVA and accommodation sensitivity in children: the mediating role of kinetic visual acuity.

Wang M, Zhu G, Li Y, Li P, Shi H, Jiang L Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1467651.

PMID: 39712315 PMC: 11662335. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1467651.


Vertical dynamic visual acuity is significantly lower than horizontal dynamic visual acuity.

Tachihara A, Soh Z, Mizuguchi T, Kandori A, Hama S, Tsuji T Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20999.

PMID: 38017190 PMC: 10684582. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48292-1.


Visual skills essential for rugby.

Millard L, Breukelman G, Burger T, Nortje J, Schulz J Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2023; 12(1):46-54.

PMID: 37641672 PMC: 10445309. DOI: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1469.


Developing dynamic defocus curve for evaluating dynamic vision accommodative function.

Wu T, Wang Y, Wei S, Guo Y, Li X BMC Ophthalmol. 2022; 22(1):106.

PMID: 35248018 PMC: 8898511. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02335-9.


Visuomotor predictors of batting performance in baseball players.

Chen R, Stone L, Li L J Vis. 2021; 21(3):3.

PMID: 33651879 PMC: 7938007. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.3.3.


References
1.
Barmack N . Dynamic visual acuity as an index of eye movement control. Vision Res. 1970; 10(12):1377-91. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(70)90089-1. View

2.
Solomon H, ZINN W, Vacroux A . Dynamic stereoacuity: a test for hitting a baseball?. J Am Optom Assoc. 1988; 59(7):522-6. View

3.
Suzumura A . The trial production of a kinetic vision tester (type AS-4A) and its application. Annu Rep Res Inst Environ Med Nagoya Univ. 1968; 16:77-89. View

4.
Stine C, Arterburn M, STERN N . Vision and sports: a review of the literature. J Am Optom Assoc. 1982; 53(8):627-33. View

5.
Brown B . Dynamic visual acuity, eye movements and peripheral acuity for moving targets. Vision Res. 1972; 12(2):305-21. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90120-4. View