» Articles » PMID: 23567869

Association Between State Laws Governing School Meal Nutrition Content and Student Weight Status: Implications for New USDA School Meal Standards

Overview
Journal JAMA Pediatr
Date 2013 Apr 10
PMID 23567869
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: This study assessed whether stronger school meal nutrition standards may improve student weight status. Results have immediate implications because of the ongoing implementation of new nutrition standards for the National School Lunch Program. OBJECTIVE To determine if state laws with stricter school meal nutrition standards are inversely associated with adolescent weight status, while controlling for unmeasured state-level confounders.

Design: Quasi-experiment.

Setting: Public schools.

Participants: Four thousand eight hundred seventy eighth-grade students in 40 states. Students were categorized by type of school lunch they usually obtained (free/reduced price, regular price, or none). INTERVENTIONS State laws governing school meal nutrition standards. States with standards that exceeded US Department of Agriculture (USDA) school meal standards were compared with states that did not exceed USDA standards. The parameter of interest was the interaction between state laws and student lunch participant status, ie, whether disparities in weight status between school lunch participants and nonparticipants were smaller in states with stricter standards.

Main Outcome Measures: Body mass index percentile and obesity status.

Results: In states that exceeded USDA standards, the difference in obesity prevalence between students who obtained free/reduced-price lunches and students who did not obtain school lunches was 12.3 percentage points smaller (95% CI, -21.5 to -3.0) compared with states that did not exceed USDA standards. Likewise, differences in mean body mass index percentile between those student populations were 11 units smaller in states that exceeded USDA standards (95% CI, -17.7 to -4.3). There was little evidence that students compensated for school meal laws by purchasing more sweets, salty snacks, or sugar-sweetened beverages from other school venues (eg, vending machines) or other sources (eg, fast food).

Conclusions And Relevance: Stringent school meal standards that reflect the latest nutrition science may improve weight status among school lunch participants, particularly those eligible for free/reduced-price lunches.

Citing Articles

School Lunch and Body Size in Japanese Junior High School Students: The Japanese National Health and Nutrition Survey.

Iwano S, Tanaka K, Takaoka A, Machida D, Tomata Y Nutrients. 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40077765 PMC: 11901768. DOI: 10.3390/nu17050895.


Mixed Methods Study Investigating Adolescent Acceptance and Implementation Outcomes of Serving Spicy Vegetables in School Lunch.

Siebert E, Lee S, Philips C, Prescott M Curr Dev Nutr. 2024; 8(8):104425.

PMID: 39224143 PMC: 11367512. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104425.


The Role of Racism in Childhood Obesity.

Lawton R, Stanford F Curr Obes Rep. 2024; 13(1):98-106.

PMID: 38172479 PMC: 10939728. DOI: 10.1007/s13679-023-00538-9.


Food Environments Within and Outside of Schools Play a Critical Role in Curtailing the Rise in Obesity among School-Aged Children over Time.

Ohri-Vachaspati P, Acciai F, Melnick E, Lloyd K, Martinelli S, DeWeese R J Nutr. 2023; 153(12):3565-3575.

PMID: 37844841 PMC: 10739773. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.09.027.


Healthy Food Policies Documented in University Food Service Contracts.

Fandetti S, Dahl A, Webster C, Bably M, Coffman M, Racine E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(16).

PMID: 37623200 PMC: 10454280. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20166617.


References
1.
Cullen K, Watson K, Zakeri I, Ralston K . Exploring changes in middle-school student lunch consumption after local school food service policy modifications. Public Health Nutr. 2006; 9(6):814-20. DOI: 10.1079/phn2005878. View

2.
Fox M, Dodd A, Wilson A, Gleason P . Association between school food environment and practices and body mass index of US public school children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109(2 Suppl):S108-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.065. View

3.
Taber D, Chriqui J, Powell L, Chaloupka F . Banning all sugar-sweetened beverages in middle schools: reduction of in-school access and purchasing but not overall consumption. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011; 166(3):256-62. PMC: 4077154. DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.200. View

4.
Must A, Strauss R . Risks and consequences of childhood and adolescent obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999; 23 Suppl 2:S2-11. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800852. View

5.
Harper S, Strumpf E, Kaufman J . Do medical marijuana laws increase marijuana use? Replication study and extension. Ann Epidemiol. 2012; 22(3):207-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.12.002. View