» Articles » PMID: 23566355

Ranking of Physiotherapeutic Evaluation Methods As Outcome Measures of Stifle Functionality in Dogs

Overview
Journal Acta Vet Scand
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 Apr 10
PMID 23566355
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Various physiotherapeutic evaluation methods are used to assess the functionality of dogs with stifle problems. Neither validity nor sensitivity of these methods has been investigated. This study aimed to determine the most valid and sensitive physiotherapeutic evaluation methods for assessing functional capacity in hind limbs of dogs with stifle problems and to serve as a basis for developing an indexed test for these dogs. A group of 43 dogs with unilateral surgically treated cranial cruciate ligament deficiency and osteoarthritic findings was used to test different physiotherapeutic evaluation methods. Twenty-one healthy dogs served as the control group and were used to determine normal variation in static weight bearing and range of motion.The protocol consisted of 14 different evaluation methods: visual evaluation of lameness, visual evaluation of diagonal movement, visual evaluation of functional active range of motion and difference in thrust of hind limbs via functional tests (sit-to-move and lie-to-move), movement in stairs, evaluation of hind limb muscle atrophy, manual evaluation of hind limb static weight bearing, quantitative measurement of static weight bearing of hind limbs with bathroom scales, and passive range of motion of hind limb stifle (flexion and extension) and tarsal (flexion and extension) joints using a universal goniometer. The results were compared with those from an orthopaedic examination, force plate analysis, radiographic evaluation, and a conclusive assessment. Congruity of the methods was assessed with a combination of three statistical approaches (Fisher's exact test and two differently calculated proportions of agreeing observations), and the components were ranked from best to worst. Sensitivities of all of the physiotherapeutic evaluation methods against each standard were calculated.

Results: Evaluation of asymmetry in a sitting and lying position, assessment of muscle atrophy, manual and measured static weight bearing, and measurement of stifle passive range of motion were the most valid and sensitive physiotherapeutic evaluation methods.

Conclusions: Ranking of the various physiotherapeutic evaluation methods was accomplished. Several of these methods can be considered valid and sensitive when examining the functionality of dogs with stifle problems.

Citing Articles

Inter-rater reliability in performing stifle goniometry in normal and cranial cruciate ligament disease affected dogs: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Volz F, Schmutterer J, Vockrodt T, Zablotski Y, Lauer S BMC Vet Res. 2024; 20(1):339.

PMID: 39085899 PMC: 11293097. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-04206-5.


Non-invasive methods to assess muscle function in dogs: A scoping review.

Dahl K, Zebis M, Vitger A, Miles J, Alkjaer T Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1116854.

PMID: 36793378 PMC: 9923109. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1116854.


Development and testing of a stifle function score in dogs.

Gundersen K, Millis D, Zhu X Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:895567.

PMID: 35958308 PMC: 9358000. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.895567.


Appendicular skeletal muscle mass assessment in dogs: a scoping literature review.

Kim A, Elam L, Lambrechts N, Salman M, Duerr F BMC Vet Res. 2022; 18(1):280.

PMID: 35842654 PMC: 9288046. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-022-03367-5.


Dangerous Behavior and Intractable Axial Skeletal Pain in Performance Horses: A Possible Role for Ganglioneuritis (14 Cases; 2014-2019).

Story M, Nout-Lomas Y, Aboellail T, Selberg K, Barrett M, Mcllwraith C Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:734218.

PMID: 34957274 PMC: 8702524. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.734218.


References
1.
Jandi A, Schulman A . Incidence of motion loss of the stifle joint in dogs with naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament rupture surgically treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: longitudinal clinical study of 412 cases. Vet Surg. 2007; 36(2):114-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00226.x. View

2.
Jerre S . Rehabilitation after extra-articular stabilisation of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009; 22(2):148-52. DOI: 10.3415/vcot-07-05-0044. View

3.
de Rooster H, van Bree H . Use of compression stress radiography for the detection of partial tears of the canine cranial cruciate ligament. J Small Anim Pract. 2000; 40(12):573-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1999.tb03024.x. View

4.
Waxman A, Robinson D, Evans R, Hulse D, Innes J, Conzemius M . Relationship between objective and subjective assessment of limb function in normal dogs with an experimentally induced lameness. Vet Surg. 2008; 37(3):241-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00372.x. View

5.
Hewetson M, Christley R, Hunt I, Voute L . Investigations of the reliability of observational gait analysis for the assessment of lameness in horses. Vet Rec. 2006; 158(25):852-7. DOI: 10.1136/vr.158.25.852. View