» Articles » PMID: 23565578

Do Patients Care About Higher Flexion in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2013 Apr 10
PMID 23565578
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Little information exists to support that patients care about flexion beyond what is needed to perform activities of daily living (ADL) after Total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to investigate if the achievement of a higher degree of knee flexion after TKA would result in a better patient perceived outcome.

Methods: The study is a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial in which 36 patients (mean age: 67.2 yrs) undergoing one-stage bilateral TKA randomly received a standard cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA in one knee and a high-flex posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA in the contra lateral knee. At follow-up ROM, satisfaction, pain, "feel" of the knee and the abilities in daily activities were assessed.

Results: At 1-year follow-up we found an expected significantly higher degree of knee flexion of 7° in the high-flex knees (p = 0.001). The high-flex TKA's showed a mean active flexion of 121°. In both TKA's the median VAS pain score was 0, the median VAS satisfaction score was 9, and the median VAS score of the patient "feel" of the knee was 9 at 1-year follow-up. Further, there were no significant differences between the knees in the performance of daily activities.

Conclusions: As expected the high-flex TKA showed increased knee flexion, but no significant differences in the patient perceived outcomes were found. This suggests little relevance to the patients of the difference in knee flexion - when flexion is of this magnitude - as pain free ROM and high patient satisfaction were achieved with both TKA's.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00294528.

Citing Articles

Virtual versus in-person physiotherapy following total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis.

Charalambous A, Ekhtiari S, Wainwright A, Najafi R, Chaudhry H, Pincus D Int Orthop. 2023; 48(1):65-70.

PMID: 38081949 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-06054-8.


The Early Clinical Outcomes Following Unrestricted Caliper Verified Kinematic Alignment Using a Medial Stabilized Design Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Cruciate Retaining Insert.

Munir S, Suzuki L, Hellman J Arthroplast Today. 2023; 24:101250.

PMID: 37920544 PMC: 10618423. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101250.


The pre-anesthetic period is the best time to evaluate the knee flexion angle for predicting the flexion angle after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study.

Ruangsomboon P, Pornrattanamaneewong C, Santanapipatkul P, Sarirasririd S, Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281237.

PMID: 36735740 PMC: 9897552. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281237.


A high degree of knee flexion after TKA promotes the ability to perform high-flexion activities and patient satisfaction in Asian population.

Han H, Kim J, Lee B, Won S, Lee M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):565.

PMID: 34154538 PMC: 8215776. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04369-4.


"This is not negotiable. You need to do this…": A directed content analysis of decision making in rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty.

Graber J, Lockhart S, Matlock D, Stevens-Lapsley J, Kittelson A J Eval Clin Pract. 2021; 28(1):99-107.

PMID: 34121294 PMC: 8669003. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13591.


References
1.
Miner A, Lingard E, Wright E, Sledge C, Katz J . Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure?. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(3):286-94. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50046. View

2.
Kim Y, Sohn K, Kim J . Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(7):1470-5. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02707. View

3.
Kim Y, Choi Y, Kim J . Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(8):1874-81. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00769. View

4.
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A . Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(1):63-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859. View

5.
Worland R, Johnson G, Alemparte J, Jessup D, Keenan J, Norambuena N . Ten to fourteen year survival and functional analysis of the AGC total knee replacement system. Knee. 2002; 9(2):133-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0160(01)00146-6. View