» Articles » PMID: 23562963

Stimulation of Contacts in Ventral but Not Dorsal Subthalamic Nucleus Normalizes Response Switching in Parkinson's Disease

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2013 Apr 9
PMID 23562963
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Switching between responses is a key executive function known to rely on the frontal cortex and the basal ganglia. Here we aimed to establish with greater anatomical specificity whether such switching could be mediated via different possible frontal-basal-ganglia circuits. Accordingly, we stimulated dorsal vs. ventral contacts of electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's patients during switching performance, and also studied matched controls. The patients underwent three sessions: once with bilateral dorsal contact stimulation, once with bilateral ventral contact stimulation, and once Off stimulation. Patients Off stimulation showed abnormal patterns of switching, and stimulation of the ventral contacts but not the dorsal contacts normalized the pattern of behavior relative to controls. This provides some of the first evidence in humans that stimulation of dorsal vs. ventral STN DBS contacts has differential effects on executive function. As response switching is an executive function known to rely on prefrontal cortex, these results suggest that ventral contact stimulation affected an executive/associative cortico-basal ganglia circuit.

Citing Articles

Optimal level of human intracranial theta activity for behavioral switching in the subthalamo-medio-prefrontal circuit.

Laquitaine M, Polosan M, Kahane P, Chabardes S, Yelnik J, Fernandez-Vidal S Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7827.

PMID: 39244544 PMC: 11380695. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52290-w.


Stimulation of non-motor subthalamic nucleus impairs selective response inhibition via prefrontal connectivity.

Waldthaler J, Sperlich A, Stussel C, Steidel K, Timmermann L, Pedrosa D Brain Commun. 2023; 5(2):fcad121.

PMID: 37113315 PMC: 10128876. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad121.


Clinical neuroscience and neurotechnology: An amazing symbiosis.

Cometa A, Falasconi A, Biasizzo M, Carpaneto J, Horn A, Mazzoni A iScience. 2022; 25(10):105124.

PMID: 36193050 PMC: 9526189. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105124.


Identification of biomarkers that predict response to subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: protocol for an open-label follow-up study.

Arumugham S, Srinivas D, Narayanaswamy J, Jaisoorya T, Kashyap H, Domenech P BMJ Open. 2021; 11(6):e047492.

PMID: 34158304 PMC: 8220486. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047492.


Anatomo-Functional Origins of the Cortical Silent Period: Spotlight on the Basal Ganglia.

Zeugin D, Ionta S Brain Sci. 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34071742 PMC: 8227635. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11060705.


References
1.
Hamani C, Richter E, Andrade-Souza Y, Hutchison W, Saint-Cyr J, Lozano A . Correspondence of microelectrode mapping with magnetic resonance imaging for subthalamic nucleus procedures. Surg Neurol. 2005; 63(3):249-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.05.036. View

2.
Greenhouse I, Gould S, Houser M, Hicks G, Gross J, Aron A . Stimulation at dorsal and ventral electrode contacts targeted at the subthalamic nucleus has different effects on motor and emotion functions in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia. 2010; 49(3):528-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.030. View

3.
Nambu A, Tokuno H, Takada M . Functional significance of the cortico-subthalamo-pallidal 'hyperdirect' pathway. Neurosci Res. 2002; 43(2):111-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-0102(02)00027-5. View

4.
Helmich R, Aarts E, de Lange F, Bloem B, Toni I . Increased dependence of action selection on recent motor history in Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(19):6105-13. PMC: 6665502. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0704-09.2009. View

5.
Mayberg H, Lozano A . Penfield revisited? Understanding and modifying behavior by deep brain stimulation for PD. Neurology. 2002; 59(9):1298-9. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.59.9.1298. View