» Articles » PMID: 23560744

Barriers to and Facilitators for Screening Women for Intimate Partner Violence in Surgical Fracture Clinics: a Qualitative Descriptive Approach

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2013 Apr 9
PMID 23560744
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a major health issue that involves any physical, sexual or psychological harm inflicted by a current or former partner. Musculoskeletal injuries represent the second most prevalent clinical manifestation of IPV. Health care professionals, however, rarely screen women for IPV. Using qualitative methods, this study aimed to explore the perceived barriers to IPV screening and potential facilitators for overcoming these barriers among orthopaedic surgeons and surgical trainees.

Methods: We conducted three focus groups with orthopaedic surgeons, senior surgical trainees, and junior surgical trainees. A semi-structured focus group guide was used to structure the discussions. Transcripts and field notes from the focus groups were analyzed using the qualitative software program N'Vivo (version 10.0; QSR International, Melbourne, Australia). To further inform our focus group findings and discuss policy changes, we conducted interviews with two opinion leaders in the field of orthopaedics. Similar to the focus groups, the interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed, and then analyzed.

Results: In the analysis, four categories of barriers were identified: surgeon perception barriers; perceived patient barriers; fracture clinic barriers and orthopaedic health care professional barriers. Some of the facilitators identified included availability of a crisis team; development of a screening form; presence of IPV posters or buttons in the fracture clinic; and the need for established policy or government support for IPV screening. The interviewees identified the need for: the introduction of evidence-based policy aiming to increase awareness about IPV among health care professionals working within the fracture clinic setting, fostering local and national champions for IPV screening, and the need to generate change on a local level.

Conclusions: There are a number of perceived barriers to screening women in the fracture clinic for IPV, many of which can be addressed through increased education and training, and additional resources in the fracture clinic. Orthopaedic health care professionals are supportive of implementing an IPV screening program in the orthopaedic fracture clinic.

Citing Articles

South Asian women's lived experiences of health care after disclosure of family violence: a qualitative meta-synthesis review.

Baloch S, McLindon E, Hameed M, Hegarty K BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):445.

PMID: 39905369 PMC: 11792442. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21619-5.


Barriers and facilitators to screening for intimate partner violence at a level 1 trauma center.

Melhado C, Decker H, Schwab M, Kaki D, Shao S, Harrison J Surgery. 2024; 176(5):1525-1531.

PMID: 39174441 PMC: 11890200. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.033.


Educational training programs on intimate partner violence in pregnancy for midwives/student midwives: A scoping review.

Manoli E, Kouta C, Karanikola M, Middleton N, Hadjigeorgiou E Eur J Midwifery. 2024; 8.

PMID: 38974928 PMC: 11225181. DOI: 10.18332/ejm/189282.


DORIS study: domestic violence in orthopaedics, a prospective cohort study at a Swedish hospital on the annual prevalence of domestic violence in orthopaedic emergency care.

Svensson Malchau K, Caragounis E, Sundfeldt M BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e085618.

PMID: 38719290 PMC: 11086206. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085618.


Health practitioners' perceptions of structural barriers to the identification of intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Hudspeth N, Cameron J, Baloch S, Tarzia L, Hegarty K BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):96.

PMID: 35065630 PMC: 8783157. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07491-8.


References
1.
Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B . Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J. 2008; 204(6):291-5. DOI: 10.1038/bdj.2008.192. View

2.
Bhandari M, Sprague S, Tornetta 3rd P, DAurora V, Schemitsch E, Shearer H . (Mis)perceptions about intimate partner violence in women presenting for orthopaedic care: a survey of Canadian orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(7):1590-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01188. View

3.
Sprague S, Madden K, Simunovic N, Godin K, Pham N, Bhandari M . Barriers to screening for intimate partner violence. Women Health. 2012; 52(6):587-605. DOI: 10.1080/03630242.2012.690840. View

4.
Bhandari M, Sprague S, Dosanjh S, Petrisor B, Resendes S, Madden K . The prevalence of intimate partner violence across orthopaedic fracture clinics in Ontario. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 93(2):132-41. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01713. View

5.
Koch T . Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. J Adv Nurs. 1994; 19(5):976-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01177.x. View