» Articles » PMID: 23559414

Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence and "low Anterior Resection Syndrome" Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer

Overview
Date 2013 Apr 6
PMID 23559414
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It was the aim of this prospective study to analyze both feasibility and effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and "low anterior resection syndrome" following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Methods: All patients who underwent sacral neuromdulation following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer (preoperative radiochemotherapy, oncologic rectal resection with total mesorectal excision) were prospectively enrolled in the study. Only patients with failure of conservative treatment and without any evidence of residual or recurrent tumor disease were candidates for sacral neuromdulation which was performed by a two-stage procedure (diagnostic percutaneous test stimulation followed by definite implant). In addition to feasibility, primary end points included success (reduction of incontinent episodes), continence and defecation status (assessed by Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score and Altomare score), and quality of life (EQ-5D). Anal manometry was performed preoperative and at 12-month follow-up. Follow-up information was derived from clinical examination 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Results: Nine patients (three females, six males) with a mean age of 61 years underwent sacral neuromodulation following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Implantation rate was 100 %. No septic morbidity was observed. After a mean follow-up of 12 months, mean Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score was reduced from 18.2 to 6.0 (p < 0.01). Incontinence episodes were significantly reduced from 7 to 0.5 (per day) and 20 to 8 (per week). Fecal urgency, fragmented defecation, and soiling were improved or resolved in two thirds. Altomare score was significantly reduced from 21.0 to 9.3 (p < 0.01). Anorectal manometry did not correlate with clinical success. Quality of life was significantly improved (EQ-5D generic: 0.42 vs. 0.74, EQ-5D-VAS score: 20 vs. 90, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Preliminary results of sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence and symptoms of "low anterior resection syndrome" are promising and enrich the therapeutic modalities if conservative management has failed.

Citing Articles

Systematic review of the management options available for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).

Sharp G, Findlay N, Clark D, Hong J Tech Coloproctol. 2025; 29(1):58.

PMID: 39903381 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03090-3.


Long-term outcomes of sacral neuromodulation for low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery.

de Miguel Valencia M, Marin G, Acevedo A, Hernando A, Alvarez A, Oteiza F Ann Coloproctol. 2024; 40(3):234-244.

PMID: 38946094 PMC: 11362764. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00542.0077.


Sacral neuromodulation for low anterior resection syndrome: current status-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pires M, Severo M, Lopes A, Neves S, Matzel K, Povo A Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 38(1):189.

PMID: 37428256 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04485-8.


Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

DAmico F, Wexner S, Vaizey C, Gouynou C, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L United European Gastroenterol J. 2020; 8(8):886-922.

PMID: 32677555 PMC: 7707876. DOI: 10.1177/2050640620943699.


The efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ram E, Meyer R, Carter D, Gutman M, Rosin D, Horesh N Tech Coloproctol. 2020; 24(8):803-815.

PMID: 32350733 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02231-8.


References
1.
George A, Kalmar K, Panarese A, Dudding T, Nicholls R, Vaizey C . Long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012; 55(3):302-6. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182401ecd. View

2.
Kim J, Kim N, Lee K, Hur H, Min B, Kim J . A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19(8):2485-93. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1. View

3.
Bohm G, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Decius A, Heussen N, Schumpelick V, Willis S . Anorectal, bladder, and sexual function in females following colorectal surgery for carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008; 23(9):893-900. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-008-0498-9. View

4.
Fischer F, Mirow L, Gondeck C, Schwandner O, Bruch H, Farke S . [Influence of adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for rectal cancer on quality of life]. Z Gastroenterol. 2005; 43(11):1213-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858663. View

5.
JORGE J, Wexner S . Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993; 36(1):77-97. DOI: 10.1007/BF02050307. View