» Articles » PMID: 23557881

Specific Aspects of Cognitive and Language Proficiency Account for Variability in Neural Indices of Semantic and Syntactic Processing in Children

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2013 Apr 6
PMID 23557881
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The neural activity mediating language processing in young children is characterized by large individual variability that is likely related in part to individual strengths and weakness across various cognitive abilities. The current study addresses the following question: How does proficiency in specific cognitive and language functions impact neural indices mediating language processing in children? Thirty typically developing seven- and eight-year-olds were divided into high-normal and low-normal proficiency groups based on performance on nonverbal IQ, auditory word recall, and grammatical morphology tests. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were elicited by semantic anomalies and phrase structure violations in naturally spoken sentences. The proficiency for each of the specific cognitive and language tasks uniquely contributed to specific aspects (e.g., timing and/or resource allocation) of neural indices underlying semantic (N400) and syntactic (P600) processing. These results suggest that distinct aptitudes within broader domains of cognition and language, even within the normal range, influence the neural signatures of semantic and syntactic processing. Furthermore, the current findings have important implications for the design and interpretation of developmental studies of ERPs indexing language processing, and they highlight the need to take into account cognitive abilities both within and outside the classic language domain.

Citing Articles

An ERP study on multiplication and its relationship to phonological processing in children and adults.

Simpson H, Henderson L, Gobel S Psychol Res. 2024; 89(1):33.

PMID: 39638885 PMC: 11621157. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02036-6.


Semantic processing of verbal narratives compared to semantic processing of visual narratives: an ERP study of school-aged children.

Lindfors H, Hansson K, Pakulak E, Cohn N, Andersson A Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1253509.

PMID: 38282837 PMC: 10812112. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1253509.


Endogenous Oscillations Time-Constrain Linguistic Segmentation: Cycling the Garden Path.

Henke L, Meyer L Cereb Cortex. 2021; 31(9):4289-4299.

PMID: 33949654 PMC: 8328215. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab086.


Neural Processes Underlying Nonword Rhyme Differentiate Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.

Hampton Wray A, Spray G J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63(8):2535-2554.

PMID: 32716683 PMC: 7872734. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00320.


Neural Indices of Semantic Processing in Early Childhood Distinguish Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.

Kreidler K, Hampton Wray A, Usler E, Weber C J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017; 60(11):3118-3134.

PMID: 29098269 PMC: 5945075. DOI: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0081.


References
1.
Stevens C, Lauinger B, Neville H . Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: an event-related brain potential study. Dev Sci. 2009; 12(4):634-46. PMC: 2718768. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00807.x. View

2.
Holcomb P . Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology. 1993; 30(1):47-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03204.x. View

3.
Kutas M, Hillyard S . Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 1980; 207(4427):203-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.7350657. View

4.
Lew-Williams C, Fernald A . Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(3):193-8. PMC: 3206966. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01871.x. View

5.
Friederici A, Steinhauer K, Mecklinger A, Meyer M . Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biol Psychol. 1998; 47(3):193-221. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(97)00033-1. View