» Articles » PMID: 23555104

Performance Evaluation of Al-Zahra Academic Medical Center Based on Iran Balanced Scorecard Model

Overview
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2013 Apr 5
PMID 23555104
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Growth and development in any country's national health system, without an efficient evaluation system, lacks the basic concepts and tools necessary for fulfilling the system's goals. The balanced scorecard (BSC) is a technique widely used to measure the performance of an organization. The basic core of the BSC is guided by the organization's vision and strategies, which are the bases for the formation of four perspectives of BSC. The goal of this research is the performance evaluation of Al-Zahra Academic Medical Center in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, based on Iran BSC model.

Materials And Methods: This is a combination (quantitative-qualitative) research which was done at Al-Zahra Academic Medical Center in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2011. The research populations were hospital managers at different levels. Sampling method was purposive sampling in which the key informed personnel participated in determining the performance indicators of hospital as the BSC team members in focused discussion groups. After determining the conceptual elements in focused discussion groups, the performance objectives (targets) and indicators of hospital were determined and sorted in perspectives by the group discussion participants. Following that, the performance indicators were calculated by the experts according to the predetermined objectives; then, the score of each indicator and the mean score of each perspective were calculated.

Results: Research findings included development of the organizational mission, vision, values, objectives, and strategies. The strategies agreed upon by the participants in the focus discussion group included five strategies, which were customer satisfaction, continuous quality improvement, development of human resources, supporting innovation, expansion of services and improving the productivity. Research participants also agreed upon four perspectives for the Al-Zahra hospital BSC. In the patients and community perspective (customer), two objectives and three indicators were agreed upon, with a mean score of 75.9%. In the internal process perspective, 4 objectives and 14 indicators were agreed upon, with a mean score of 79.37%. In the learning and growth perspective, four objectives and eight indicators were agreed upon, with a mean score of 81.11%. Finally, in the financial perspective, two objectives and five indicators were agreed upon, with a mean score of 67.15%.

Conclusion: One way to create demand for hospital services is performance evaluation by paying close attention to all BSC perspectives, especially the non-financial perspectives such as customers and internal processes perspectives. In this study, the BSC showed the differences in performance level of the organization in different perspectives, which would assist the hospital managers improve their performance indicators. The learning and growth perspective obtained the highest score, and the financial perspective obtained the least score. Since the learning and growth perspective acts as a base for all other perspectives and they depend on it, hospitals must continuously improve the service processes and the quality of services by educating staff and updating their policies and procedures. This can increase customer satisfaction and productivity and finally improve the BSC in financial perspective.

Citing Articles

Health System Reform Plan and Performance of Hospitals: an Iranian Case Study.

Hasan Y, Parviz S, Bahram N Mater Sociomed. 2017; 29(3):201-206.

PMID: 29109667 PMC: 5644193. DOI: 10.5455/msm.2017.29.201-206.


The Evaluation of Hospital Performance in Iran: A Systematic Review Article.

Bahadori M, Izadi A, Ghardashi F, Ravangard R, Hosseini S Iran J Public Health. 2016; 45(7):855-66.

PMID: 27516991 PMC: 4980339.


Various indicators for the assessment of hospitals' performance status: differences and similarities.

Lotfi F, Kalhor R, Bastani P, Shaarbafchi Zadeh N, Eslamian M, Dehghani M Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16(4):e12950.

PMID: 24910796 PMC: 4028769. DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.12950.

References
1.
Chen X, Yamauchi K, Kato K, Nishimura A, Ito K . Using the balanced scorecard to measure Chinese and Japanese hospital performance. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2006; 19(4-5):339-50. DOI: 10.1108/09526860610671391. View

2.
Glickman S, Baggett K, Krubert C, Peterson E, Schulman K . Promoting quality: the health-care organization from a management perspective. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):341-8. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm047. View

3.
Zelman W, Pink G, Matthias C . Use of the balanced scorecard in health care. J Health Care Finance. 2003; 29(4):1-16. View

4.
Peters D, Noor A, Singh L, Kakar F, Hansen P, Burnham G . A balanced scorecard for health services in Afghanistan. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85(2):146-51. PMC: 2636277. DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.033746. View

5.
Santiago J . Use of the balanced scorecard to improve the quality of behavioral health care. Psychiatr Serv. 1999; 50(12):1571-6. DOI: 10.1176/ps.50.12.1571. View