Ups and Downs of Daily Life: Age Effects on the Impact of Daily Appraisal Variability on Depressive Symptoms

Overview

Journal J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci

Specialties Geriatrics
Psychology
Social Sciences

Date 2013 Apr 4

PMID 23550088

Citations 19

Authors

Brenda R Whitehead

Cindy S Bergeman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Day-to-day variability in appraisals has emerged as an index of emotion regulation and overall well-being; there is also evidence that such emotion regulation processes change with age. We investigate the impact of day-to-day variability in positive and negative event appraisals on depressive symptoms, focusing on (a) how variability and mean appraisal characteristics interact to impact well-being and (b) whether these effects differ by age.

Methods: Participants from the Notre Dame Study of Health & Well-Being (aged 40-75 years, N = 654) completed daily diaries for up to 56 days, along with a global survey. Measures included daily data on life events and appraisals and global assessments of depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale) and neuroticism.

Results: Both mean and variability components of daily positive and negative event appraisals predict global depressive symptoms; mean and variability interactions were also significant. The negative appraisal effects became less pronounced with age.

Discussion: Findings suggest that those in later life are better able to manage the impact that their cognitive and emotional responses to daily stressors have on depressive symptoms. The results also highlight the importance of examining daily variability-in addition to mean levels-in understanding the impact of daily events and appraisals on well-being.

Citing Articles

Depression and emotion regulation strategy use moderate age-related attentional positivity bias.

Faul L, Bellaiche L, Madden D, Smoski M, LaBar K Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1427480.

PMID: 39737246 PMC: 11682907. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1427480.

Participation factors in a self-quantification program for family caregivers of community-dwelling older adults with long-term care in Japan.

Wakui T, Fujihara S, Moriyama Y, Nakagawa T, Okubo S, Obuchi S BMC Res Notes. 2024; 17(1):388.

PMID: 39725997 PMC: 11670400. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-024-07024-y.

Associations Between Enjoyable Activities and Uplifting Events: Effects on Momentary Positive Affect in Adulthood.

Chen S, Hyun J, Graefe A, Almeida D, Mowen A, Sliwinski M J Leis Res. 2022; 53(2):211-228.

PMID: 36210884 PMC: 9534485. DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2021.1878002.

Older and Wiser? Age Moderates the Association Between Discrimination and Depressive Symptoms in American Indians and Alaska Natives.

Danyluck C, Blair I, Manson S, Laudenslager M, Daugherty S, Jiang L J Aging Health. 2021; 33(7-8_suppl):10S-17S.

PMID: 34167343 PMC: 9087640. DOI: 10.1177/08982643211013699.

Daily Stress Processes in a Pandemic: The Effects of Worry, Age, and Affect.

Nelson N, Bergeman C Gerontologist. 2020; 61(2):196-204.

PMID: 33186445 PMC: 7717331. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa187.

References

Neupert S, Almeida D, Charles S . Age differences in reactivity to daily stressors: the role of personal control. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007; 62(4):P216-25. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/62.4.p216. View

Eaton L, Funder D . Emotional experience in daily life: valence, variability, and rate of change. Emotion. 2003; 1(4):413-21. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.4.413. View

Benyamini Y, Idler E, Leventhal H, Leventhal E . Positive affect and function as influences on self-assessments of health: expanding our view beyond illness and disability. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000; 55(2):P107-16. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/55.2.p107. View

Sliwinski M, Almeida D, Smyth J, Stawski R . Intraindividual change and variability in daily stress processes: findings from two measurement-burst diary studies. Psychol Aging. 2009; 24(4):828-40. PMC: 2857711. DOI: 10.1037/a0017925. View

Peeters F, Nicolson N, Berkhof J, Delespaul P, deVries M . Effects of daily events on mood states in major depressive disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003; 112(2):203-11. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.112.2.203. View

David J, Suls J . Coping efforts in daily life: role of big five traits and problem appraisals. J Pers. 1999; 67(2):265-94. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6494.00056. View

Stawski R, Sliwinski M, Almeida D, Smyth J . Reported exposure and emotional reactivity to daily stressors: the roles of adult age and global perceived stress. Psychol Aging. 2008; 23(1):52-61. PMC: 3485068. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.52. View

Deboeck P, Montpetit M, Bergeman C, Boker S . Using derivative estimates to describe intraindividual variability at multiple time scales. Psychol Methods. 2009; 14(4):367-86. PMC: 5636625. DOI: 10.1037/a0016622. View

Ehring T, Tuschen-Caffier B, Schnulle J, Fischer S, Gross J . Emotion regulation and vulnerability to depression: spontaneous versus instructed use of emotion suppression and reappraisal. Emotion. 2010; 10(4):563-72. DOI: 10.1037/a0019010. View

10.

Bolger N, SCHILLING E . Personality and the problems of everyday life: the role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. J Pers. 1991; 59(3):355-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00253.x. View

11.

Suls J, Martin R . The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. J Pers. 2005; 73(6):1485-509. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00356.x. View

12.

Costa Jr P, McCrae R . Personality in adulthood: a six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(5):853-63. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.853. View

13.

Covinsky K, Yaffe K, Lindquist K, Cherkasova E, Yelin E, Blazer D . Depressive symptoms in middle age and the development of later-life functional limitations: the long-term effect of depressive symptoms. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58(3):551-6. PMC: 2904810. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02723.x. View

14.

Carstensen L, Hershfield H . Beyond stereotypes: Using socioemotional selectivity theory to improve messaging to older adults. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2021; 30(4):327-334. PMC: 8340497. DOI: 10.1177/09637214211011468. View

15.

van Eck M, Nicolson N, Berkhof J . Effects of stressful daily events on mood states: relationship to global perceived stress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999; 75(6):1572-85. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.6.1572. View

16.

Fredrickson B . What Good Are Positive Emotions?. Rev Gen Psychol. 2011; 2(3):300-319. PMC: 3156001. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300. View

17.

Matthews K, Gump B, Owens J . Chronic stress influences cardiovascular and neuroendocrine responses during acute stress and recovery, especially in men. Health Psychol. 2001; 20(6):403-10. View

18.

Charles S, Luong G, Almeida D, Ryff C, Sturm M, Love G . Fewer ups and downs: daily stressors mediate age differences in negative affect. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010; 65B(3):279-86. PMC: 2981451. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbq002. View

19.

Ong A, Bergeman C, Bisconti T, Wallace K . Psychological resilience, positive emotions, and successful adaptation to stress in later life. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 91(4):730-49. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.730. View

20.

Urry H . Seeing, thinking, and feeling: emotion-regulating effects of gaze-directed cognitive reappraisal. Emotion. 2010; 10(1):125-35. DOI: 10.1037/a0017434. View