Initial Experience from a Large Referral Center with Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagogastrectomy for Oncologic Purposes
Overview
General Surgery
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Background: We report our initial experience of patients undergoing robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy (RAIL) for oncologic purposes at a large-referral center.
Methods: A retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing RAIL from 2010-2011 was performed. Basic demographics were recorded. Oncologic variables recorded included: tumor type, location, postoperative tumor margins, and nodal harvest. Immediate 30-day postoperative complications also were analyzed.
Results: Fifty patients underwent RAIL with median age of 66 (range 42-82) years. The mean body mass index was 28.6 ± 0.7 kg/m(2); 54% and the majority had an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 3. The mean and median number of lymph nodes retrieved during surgery was 20 ± 1.4 and 18.5 respectively. R0 resections were achieved in all patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 14 (28%) patients, including atrial fibrillation in 5 (10%), pneumonia in 5 (10%), anastomotic leak in 1 (2%), conduit staple line leak in 1 (2%), and chyle leak in 2 (4%). The median ICU stay and length of hospitalization (LOH) were 2 and 9 days respectively. Total mean operating time calculated from time of skin incision to wound closure was 445 ± 85 minutes; however, operative times decreased over time. Similarly, there was a trend toward lower complications after the first 29 cases but this did not reach statistical significance. There were no in-hospital mortalities.
Conclusions: We demonstrated that RAIL for esophageal cancer can be performed safely and may be associated with fewer complications after a learning curve, shorter ICU stay, and LOH.
Drake J, Sinnamon A, Saeed S, Mehta R, Palm R, Baldonado J J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 15(2):544-554.
PMID: 38756649 PMC: 11094488. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-923.
Patel N, Patel P, Yeung K, Monk D, Mohammadi B, Mughal M Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(7):4281-4297.
PMID: 38480565 PMC: 11164768. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15148-5.
Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy: Current Situation and Future Perspectives.
Watanabe M, Kuriyama K, Terayama M, Okamura A, Kanamori J, Imamura Y Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023; 29(4):168-176.
PMID: 37225478 PMC: 10466119. DOI: 10.5761/atcs.ra.23-00064.
Shen T, Zhang Y, Cao Y, Li C, Li H Front Surg. 2022; 9:998282.
PMID: 36406371 PMC: 9672456. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.998282.
Minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Bograd A, Molena D Curr Probl Surg. 2021; 58(10):100984.
PMID: 34629156 PMC: 9089813. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.100984.