Clinical Features of Kidney Cancer in Primary Care: a Case-control Study Using Primary Care Records

Overview

Journal Br J Gen Pract

Specialty Public Health

Date 2013 Apr 2

PMID 23540481

Citations 38

Authors

Elizabeth Shephard

Richard Neal

Peter Rose

Fiona Walter

William T Hamilton

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Kidney cancer accounts for over 4000 UK deaths annually, and is one of the cancer sites with a poor mortality record compared with Europe.

Aim: To identify and quantify all clinical features of kidney cancer in primary care.

Design: Case-control study, using General Practice Research Database records.

Method: A total of 3149 patients aged ≥40 years, diagnosed with kidney cancer between 2000 and 2009, and 14 091 age, sex and practice-matched controls, were selected. Clinical features associated with kidney cancer were identified, and analysed using conditional logistic regression. Positive predictive values for features of kidney cancer were estimated.

Results: Cases consulted more frequently than controls in the year before diagnosis: median 16 consultations (interquartile range 10-25) versus 8 (4-15): P<0.001. Fifteen features were independently associated with kidney cancer: visible haematuria, odds ratio 37 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 28 to 49), abdominal pain 2.8 (95% CI = 2.4 to 3.4), microcytosis 2.6 (95% CI = 1.9 to 3.4), raised inflammatory markers 2.4 (95% CI = 2.1 to 2.8), thrombocytosis 2.2 (95% CI = 1.7 to 2.7), low haemoglobin 1.9 (95% CI = 1.6 to 2.2), urinary tract infection 1.8 (95% CI = 1.5 to 2.1), nausea 1.8 (95% CI = 1.4 to 2.3), raised creatinine 1.7 (95% CI = 1.5 to 2.0), leukocytosis 1.5 (95% CI = 1.2 to 1.9), fatigue 1.5 (95% CI = 1.2 to 1.9), constipation 1.4 (95% CI = 1.1 to 1.7), back pain 1.4 (95% CI = 1.2 to 1.7), abnormal liver function 1.3 (95% CI = 1.2 to 1.5), and raised blood sugar 1.2 (95% CI = 1.1 to 1.4). The positive predictive value for visible haematuria in patients aged ≥60 years was 1.0% (95% CI = 0.8 to 1.3).

Conclusion: Visible haematuria is the commonest and most powerful single predictor of kidney cancer, and the risk rises when additional symptoms are present. When considered alongside the risk of bladder cancer, the overall risk of urinary tract cancer from haematuria warrants referral.

Citing Articles

The prognostic value of visible hematuria is only significant in T1a renal cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.

Zhang Y, Li X, Zuo S, Ma X, Chen L, Xiong L BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):247.

PMID: 39511512 PMC: 11542408. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01635-0.

Understanding symptom contribution to sex inequality in bladder and renal cancer stage at diagnosis.

Zhou Y, Lyratzopoulos G, Rajan P, Walter F, Wu J BJUI Compass. 2024; 5(7):691-698.

PMID: 39022664 PMC: 11249815. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.360.

The Clinical Value of Pre-Diagnostic Thrombocytosis for the Detection of Lung Cancer in Primary Care.

Barlow M, Hamilton W, Bailey S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38539489 PMC: 10969421. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16061154.

Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial assessing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Electronic RIsk-assessment for CAncer for patients in general practice (ERICA).

Hamilton W, Mounce L, Abel G, Dean S, Campbell J, Warren F BMJ Open. 2023; 13(3):e065232.

PMID: 36940950 PMC: 10030284. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065232.

Agreement between patient's description of abdominal symptoms of possible upper gastrointestinal cancer and general practitioner consultation notes: a qualitative analysis of video-recorded UK primary care consultation data.

Hardy V, Usher-Smith J, Archer S, Barnes R, Lancaster J, Johnson M BMJ Open. 2023; 13(1):e058766.

PMID: 36604136 PMC: 9827246. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058766.

References

Bergstrom A, Hsieh C, Lindblad P, Lu C, Cook N, Wolk A . Obesity and renal cell cancer--a quantitative review. Br J Cancer. 2001; 85(7):984-90. PMC: 2375100. DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2040. View

Hamilton W, Peters T, Round A, Sharp D . What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made? A population based case-control study. Thorax. 2005; 60(12):1059-65. PMC: 1747254. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2005.045880. View

Tate A, Martin A, Ali A, Cassell J . Using free text information to explore how and when GPs code a diagnosis of ovarian cancer: an observational study using primary care records of patients with ovarian cancer. BMJ Open. 2011; 1(1):e000025. PMC: 3191398. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2010-000025. View

Lyratzopoulos G, Neal R, Barbiere J, Rubin G, Abel G . Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(4):353-65. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70041-4. View

Chow W, Dong L, Devesa S . Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2010; 7(5):245-57. PMC: 3012455. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.46. View

Shephard E, Stapley S, Neal R, Rose P, Walter F, Hamilton W . Clinical features of bladder cancer in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62(602):e598-604. PMC: 3426598. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X654560. View

Bruyninckx R, Buntinx F, Aertgeerts B, Van Casteren V . The diagnostic value of macroscopic haematuria for the diagnosis of urological cancer in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2003; 53(486):31-5. PMC: 1314489. View

Jones R, Latinovic R, Charlton J, Gulliford M . Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database. BMJ. 2007; 334(7602):1040. PMC: 1871798. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39171.637106.AE. View

Hamilton W . Diagnosis: Cancer diagnosis in UK primary care. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012; 9(5):251-2. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.63. View

10.

Summerton N, Mann S, Rigby A, Ashley J, Palmer S, Hetherington J . Patients with new onset haematuria: assessing the discriminant value of clinical information in relation to urological malignancies. Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 52(477):284-9. PMC: 1314268. View

11.

Vedsted P, Olesen F . Are the serious problems in cancer survival partly rooted in gatekeeper principles? An ecologic study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011; 61(589):e508-12. PMC: 3145535. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X588484. View

12.

Khan N, Harrison S, Rose P . Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2010; 60(572):e128-36. PMC: 2828861. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X483562. View

13.

Stapley S, Peters T, Neal R, Rose P, Walter F, Hamilton W . The risk of pancreatic cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic records. Br J Cancer. 2012; 106(12):1940-4. PMC: 3388562. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.190. View

14.

Hamilton W, Kernick D . Clinical features of primary brain tumours: a case-control study using electronic primary care records. Br J Gen Pract. 2007; 57(542):695-9. PMC: 2151783. View

15.

Hamilton W, Round A, Sharp D, Peters T . Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2005; 93(4):399-405. PMC: 2361578. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602714. View

16.

Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C . Identifying patients with suspected renal tract cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm. Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62(597):e251-60. PMC: 3310031. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X636074. View

17.

Thiru K, Hassey A, Sullivan F . Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. BMJ. 2003; 326(7398):1070. PMC: 155692. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1070. View