» Articles » PMID: 23539198

Transcriptional Profiling of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae T2 Cells Upon Exposure to Hardwood Spent Sulphite Liquor: Comparison to Acetic Acid, Furfural and Hydroxymethylfurfural

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2013 Mar 30
PMID 23539198
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Global gene expression was analyzed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae T2 cells grown in the presence of hardwood spent sulphite liquor (HW SSL) and each of the three main inhibitors in HW SSL, acetic acid, hydroxymethyfurfural (HMF) and furfural, using a S. cerevisiae DNA oligonucleotide microarray. The objective was to compare the gene expression profiles of T2 cells in response to the individual inhibitors against that elicited in response to HW SSL. Acetic acid mainly affected the expression of genes related to the uptake systems of the yeast as well as energy generation and metabolism. Furfural and HMF mainly affected the transcription of genes involved in the redox balance of the cell. On the other hand, the effect of HW SSL on S. cerevisiae T2 cells was distinct and considerably more diverse as compared to the effect of individual inhibitors found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. This is not surprising as HW SSL contains a complex mixture of inhibitors which may act synergistically. HW SSL elicited significant changes in expression of genes involved in diverse and multiple effects on several aspects of the cellular structure and function. A notable response to HW SSL was decreased expression of the ribosomal protein genes in T2 cells. In addition, HW SSL decreased the expression of genes functioning in the synthesis and transport of proteins as well as metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids, vitamins and vacuolar proteins. Furthermore, the expression of genes involved in multidrug resistance, iron transport and pheromone response was increased, suggesting that T2 cells grown in the presence of HW SSL may have activated pheromone response and/or activated pleiotropic drug response. Some of the largest changes in gene expression were observed in the presence of HW SSL and the affected genes are involved in mating, iron transport, stress response and phospholipid metabolism. A total of 59 out of the 400 genes differentially expressed in the presence of HW SSL, acetic acid, HMF and furfural, belonged to the category of poorly characterized genes. The results indicate that transcriptional responses to individual lignocellulosic inhibitors gave a different picture and may not be representative of how the cells would respond to the presence of all the inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates such as HW SSL.

Citing Articles

strains performing similarly during fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates show pronounced differences in transcriptional stress responses.

Camara E, Mormino M, Siewers V, Nygard Y Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(5):e0233023.

PMID: 38587374 PMC: 11107148. DOI: 10.1128/aem.02330-23.


Identification of acetic acid sensitive strains through biosensor-based screening of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae CRISPRi library.

Mormino M, Lenitz I, Siewers V, Nygard Y Microb Cell Fact. 2022; 21(1):214.

PMID: 36243715 PMC: 9571444. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-022-01938-7.


The cell wall and the response and tolerance to stresses of biotechnological relevance in yeasts.

Ribeiro R, Bourbon-Melo N, Sa-Correia I Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:953479.

PMID: 35966694 PMC: 9366716. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.953479.


RNA-Seq Based Transcriptome Analysis of DSM 1863 Grown on Glucose, Acetate and an Aqueous Condensate from the Fast Pyrolysis of Wheat Straw.

Kubisch C, Kovilein A, Aliyu H, Ochsenreither K J Fungi (Basel). 2022; 8(8).

PMID: 35893132 PMC: 9394295. DOI: 10.3390/jof8080765.


Rational and evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of dicarboxylic acids from lignocellulosic biomass and exploring genetic mechanisms of the yeast tolerance to the biomass hydrolysate.

Stovicek V, Dato L, Almqvist H, Schopping M, Chekina K, Pedersen L Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022; 15(1):22.

PMID: 35219341 PMC: 8882276. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-022-02121-1.