» Articles » PMID: 23533491

Optimization on Preparation Condition of Propolis Flavonoids Liposome by Response Surface Methodology and Research of Its Immunoenhancement Activity

Overview
Date 2013 Mar 28
PMID 23533491
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study is to prepare propolis flavonoids liposome (PFL) and optimize the preparation condition and to investigate further whether liposome could promote the immunoenhancement activity of propolis flavonoids (PF). PFL was prepared with ethanol injection method, and the preparation conditions of PFL were optimized with response surface methodology (RSM). Moreover, the immunoenhancement activity of PFL and PF in vitro was determined. The result showed that the optimal preparation conditions for PFL by response surface methodology were as follows: ratio of lipid to drug (w/w) 9.6 : 1, ratio of soybean phospholipid to cholesterol (w/w) 8.5 : 1, and speed of injection 0.8 mL·min(-1). Under these conditions, the experimental encapsulation efficiency of PFL was 91.67 ± 0.21%, which was close to the predicted value. Therefore, the optimized preparation condition is very reliable. Moreover, the results indicated that PFL could not only significantly promote lymphocytes proliferation singly or synergistically with PHA, but also increase expression level of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA. These indicated that liposome could significantly improve the immunoenhancement activity of PF. PFL demonstrates the significant immunoenhancement activity, which provides the theoretical basis for the further experiment in vivo.

Citing Articles

Preparation, Statistical Optimization and Characterization of Propolis-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Using Box-Behnken Design.

Taherzadeh S, Naeimifar A, Yeganeh E, Esmaili Z, Mahjoub R, Javar H Adv Pharm Bull. 2021; 11(2):301-310.

PMID: 33880352 PMC: 8046400. DOI: 10.34172/apb.2021.043.


Standardization, anti-carcinogenic potential and biosafety of Indian propolis.

Kapare H, Lohidasan S, Sinnathambi A, Mahadik K J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2017; 10(2):81-87.

PMID: 29217339 PMC: 6598798. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2017.06.003.


Discovery and Current Status of Evaluation System of Bioavailability and Related Pharmaceutical Technologies for Traditional Chinese Medicines--Flos Lonicerae Japonicae--Fructus Forsythiae Herb Couples as an Example.

Zhou W, Cai B, Shan J, Wang S, Di L Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16(12):28812-40.

PMID: 26690115 PMC: 4691079. DOI: 10.3390/ijms161226132.


Anti-inflammatory property of propolis.

Chirumbolo S J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2015; 56(2):163-4.

PMID: 25759523 PMC: 4345176. DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.14-110.


Propolis Modifies Collagen Types I and III Accumulation in the Matrix of Burnt Tissue.

Olczyk P, Wisowski G, Komosinska-Vassev K, Stojko J, Klimek K, Olczyk M Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013; 2013:423809.

PMID: 23781260 PMC: 3679764. DOI: 10.1155/2013/423809.

References
1.
Salomao K, de Souza E, Henriques-Pons A, Barbosa H, de Castro S . Brazilian Green Propolis: Effects In Vitro and In Vivo on Trypanosoma cruzi. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2009; 2011:185918. PMC: 3094871. DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nep014. View

2.
Zhao X, Fan Y, Wang D, Hu Y, Guo L, Ruan S . Immunological adjuvant efficacy of glycyrrhetinic acid liposome against Newcastle disease vaccine. Vaccine. 2011; 29(52):9611-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.053. View

3.
Shinmei Y, Yano H, Kagawa Y, Izawa K, Akagi M, Inoue T . Effect of Brazilian propolis on sneezing and nasal rubbing in experimental allergic rhinitis of mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2009; 31(4):688-93. DOI: 10.3109/08923970903078443. View

4.
Bufalo M, Candeias J, Sforcin J . In vitro cytotoxic effect of Brazilian green propolis on human laryngeal epidermoid carcinoma (HEp-2) cells. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2008; 6(4):483-7. PMC: 2781777. DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nem147. View

5.
Zhao X, Liu J, Hu Y, Fan Y, Wang D, Yuan J . Optimization on condition of glycyrrhetinic acid liposome by RSM and the research of its immunological activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2012; 51(3):299-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.05.005. View