» Articles » PMID: 23527053

Using Species-area Relationships to Inform Baseline Conservation Targets for the Deep North East Atlantic

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Mar 26
PMID 23527053
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Demands on the resources of the deep-sea have increased in recent years. Consequently, the need to create and implement a comprehensive network of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help manage and protect these resources has become a global political priority. Efforts are currently underway to implement MPA networks in the deep North East Atlantic. To ensure these networks are effective, it is essential that baseline information be available to inform the conservation planning process. Using empirical data, we calculated conservation targets for sessile benthic invertebrates in the deep North East Atlantic for consideration during the planning process. We assessed Species-Area Relationships across two depth bands (200-1100 m and 1100-1800 m) and nine substrata. Conservation targets were predicted for each substratum within each depth band using z-values obtained from fitting a power model to the Species-Area Relationships of observed and estimated species richness (Chao1). Results suggest an MPA network incorporating 10% of the North East Atlantic's deep-sea area would protect approximately 58% and 49% of sessile benthic species for the depth bands 200-1100 m and 1100-1800 m, respectively. Species richness was shown to vary with substratum type indicating that, along with depth, substratum information needs to be incorporated into the conservation planning process to ensure the most effective MPA network is implemented in the deep North East Atlantic.

Citing Articles

Community composition exceeds area as a predictor of long-term conservation value.

OSullivan J, Terry J, Wilson R, Rossberg A PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(1):e1010804.

PMID: 36716317 PMC: 9946215. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010804.


A strategy for the conservation of biodiversity on mid-ocean ridges from deep-sea mining.

Dunn D, Van Dover C, Etter R, Smith C, Levin L, Morato T Sci Adv. 2018; 4(7):eaar4313.

PMID: 29978040 PMC: 6031377. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aar4313.

References
1.
Gaston K, Fuller R . Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007; 23(1):14-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.001. View

2.
Chittaro P, Kaplan I, Keller A, Levin P . Trade-offs between species conservation and the size of marine protected areas. Conserv Biol. 2009; 24(1):197-206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01323.x. View

3.
Ramirez-Llodra E, Tyler P, Baker M, Bergstad O, Clark M, Escobar E . Man and the last great wilderness: human impact on the deep sea. PLoS One. 2011; 6(8):e22588. PMC: 3148232. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022588. View

4.
Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime J, Hector A . Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science. 2001; 294(5543):804-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1064088. View

5.
McClain C, Barry J . Habitat heterogeneity, disturbance, and productivity work in concert to regulate biodiversity in deep submarine canyons. Ecology. 2010; 91(4):964-76. DOI: 10.1890/09-0087.1. View