» Articles » PMID: 23525095

Comparison of Spirometric Thresholds in Diagnosing Smoking-related Airflow Obstruction

Overview
Journal Thorax
Date 2013 Mar 26
PMID 23525095
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is based on detection of airflow obstruction on spirometry. There is no consensus regarding using a fixed threshold to define airflow obstruction versus using the lower limit of normal (LLN) adjusted for age. We compared the accuracy and discrimination of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommended fixed ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity<0.70 with LLN in diagnosing smoking-related airflow obstruction using CT-defined emphysema and gas trapping as the disease gold standard.

Methods: Data from a large multicentre study (COPDGene), which included current and former smokers (age range 45-80 years) with and without airflow obstruction, were analysed. Concordance between spirometric thresholds was measured. The accuracy of the thresholds in diagnosing emphysema and gas trapping was assessed using quantitative CT as gold standard.

Results: 7743 subjects were included. There was very good agreement between the two spirometric cutoffs (κ=0.85; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.86, p<0.001). 7.3% were discordant. Subjects with airflow obstruction by fixed ratio only had a greater degree of emphysema (4.1% versus 1.2%, p<0.001) and gas trapping (19.8% vs 7.5%, p<0.001) than those positive by LLN only, and also smoking controls without airflow obstruction (4.1% vs 1.9% and 19.8% vs 10.9%, respectively, p<0.001). On follow-up, the fixed ratio only group had more exacerbations than smoking controls.

Conclusions: Compared with the fixed ratio, the use of LLN fails to identify a number of patients with significant pulmonary pathology and respiratory morbidity.

Citing Articles

Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Evidence From the NHANES III and 2007-2012.

Zou W, Ou J, Wu F, Xiao S, Deng Z, Li H Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025; 20:217-229.

PMID: 39901929 PMC: 11789505. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S497634.


Unadjusted Lower Limit of Normal for Airflow Obstruction.

Bhatt S, Bodduluri S, Nakhmani A, Oelsner E Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024; 209(8):1028-1030.

PMID: 38301239 PMC: 11531222. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202312-2301LE.


GOLD 2024: a brief overview of key changes.

Agusti A, Vogelmeier C J Bras Pneumol. 2023; 49(6):e20230369.

PMID: 38126685 PMC: 10760434. DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230369.


Reply to Neder, to Ogata , and to Graham.

Bhatt S, Nakhmani A, Fortis S, Strand M, Silverman E, Sciurba F Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023; 209(3):343-345.

PMID: 38033318 PMC: 10840780. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2016LE.


Distinctive features of the oropharyngeal microbiome in Inuit of Nunavik and correlations of mild to moderate bronchial obstruction with dysbiosis.

Flahaut M, Leprohon P, Pham N, Gingras H, Bourbeau J, Papadopoulou B Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):16622.

PMID: 37789055 PMC: 10547696. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43821-4.


References
1.
. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2011; 35 Suppl 1:S64-71. PMC: 3632174. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-s064. View

2.
Decramer M, Rennard S, Troosters T, Mapel D, Giardino N, Mannino D . COPD as a lung disease with systemic consequences--clinical impact, mechanisms, and potential for early intervention. COPD. 2008; 5(4):235-56. DOI: 10.1080/15412550802237531. View

3.
Garcia-Rio F, Soriano J, Miravitlles M, Munoz L, Duran-Tauleria E, Sanchez G . Overdiagnosing subjects with COPD using the 0.7 fixed ratio: correlation with a poor health-related quality of life. Chest. 2010; 139(5):1072-1080. DOI: 10.1378/chest.10-1721. View

4.
Song G, Barbosa Jr E, Tustison N, Gefter W, Kreider M, Gee J . A comparative study of HRCT image metrics and PFT values for characterization of ILD and COPD. Acad Radiol. 2012; 19(7):857-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.03.007. View

5.
Roberts S, Farber M, Knox K, Phillips G, Bhatt N, Mastronarde J . FEV1/FVC ratio of 70% misclassifies patients with obstruction at the extremes of age. Chest. 2006; 130(1):200-6. DOI: 10.1378/chest.130.1.200. View