» Articles » PMID: 23522087

Existence and Functionality of Emergency Obstetric Care Services at District Level in Kenya: Theoretical Coverage Versus Reality

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2013 Mar 26
PMID 23522087
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The knowledge on emergency obstetric care (EmOC) is limited in Kenya, where only partial data from sub-national studies exist. The EmOC process indicators have also not been integrated into routine health management information system to monitor progress in safe motherhood interventions both at national and lower levels of the health system. In a country with a high maternal mortality burden, the implication is that decision makers are unaware of the extent of need for life-saving care and, therefore, where to intervene. The objective of the study was to assess the actual existence and functionality of EmOC services at district level.

Methods: This was a facility-based cross-sectional study. Data were collected from 40 health facilities offering delivery services in Malindi District, Kenya. Data presented are part of the "Response to accountable priority setting for trust in health systems" (REACT) study, in which EmOC was one of the service areas selected to assess fairness and legitimacy of priority setting in health care. The main outcome measures in this study were the number of facilities providing EmOC, their geographical distribution, and caesarean section rates in relation to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations.

Results: Among the 40 facilities assessed, 29 were government owned, seven were private and four were voluntary organisations. The ratio of EmOC facilities to population size was met (6.2/500,000), compared to the recommended 5/500,000. However, using the strict WHO definition, none of the facilities met the EmOC requirements, since assisted delivery, by vacuum or forceps was not provided in any facility. Rural-urban inequities in geographical distribution of facilities were observed. The facilities were not providing sufficient life-saving care as measured by caesarean section rates, which were below recommended levels (3.7% in 2008 and 4.5% in 2009). The rates were lower in the rural than in urban areas (2.1% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.001 ) in 2008 and (2.7% vs. 7.7%; p < 0.001) in 2009.

Conclusions: The gaps in existence and functionality of EmOC services revealed in this study may point to the health system conditions contributing to lack of improvements in maternal survival in Kenya. As such, the findings bear considerable implications for policy and local priority setting.

Citing Articles

Measuring social, economic, policy, and health system determinants of maternal health and survival: An urgent global priority.

Jolivet R, Gausman J, Langer A PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317095.

PMID: 39792850 PMC: 11723637. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317095.


A mixed methods study on continuity and care coordination based on the obstetric near miss approach.

Mulongo S, Kaura D, Mash B Health SA. 2024; 29:2421.

PMID: 38726055 PMC: 11079400. DOI: 10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2421.


Validating indicators for monitoring availability and geographic distribution of emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmoNC) facilities: A study triangulating health system, facility, and geospatial data.

Gausman J, Pingray V, Adanu R, Bandoh D, Berrueta M, Blossom J PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0287904.

PMID: 37708180 PMC: 10501555. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287904.


The determinants of staff retention after Emergency Obstetrics and Newborn Care training in Kenya: a cross-sectional study.

Shikuku D, Nyaoke I, Maina O, Eyinda M, Gichuru S, Nyaga L BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):872.

PMID: 35794569 PMC: 9261014. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08253-2.


The challenges for women's health in sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons learned from an integrative multistakeholder workshop in Gabon.

Habib M, Adegnika A, Honkpehedji J, Klug S, Lobmaier S, Vogg K J Glob Health. 2021; 11:02002.

PMID: 34552713 PMC: 8442509. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.11.02002.


References
1.
Prual A, Bouvier-Colle M, de Bernis L, Breart G . Severe maternal morbidity from direct obstetric causes in West Africa: incidence and case fatality rates. Bull World Health Organ. 2000; 78(5):593-602. PMC: 2560760. View

2.
Ronsmans C, De Brouwere V, Dubourg D, Dieltiens G . Measuring the need for life-saving obstetric surgery in developing countries. BJOG. 2004; 111(10):1027-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00247.x. View

3.
Ronsmans C, Graham W . Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006; 368(9542):1189-200. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69380-X. View

4.
Paxton A, Bailey P, Lobis S, Fry D . Global patterns in availability of emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006; 93(3):300-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.01.030. View

5.
Olsen O, Ndeki S, Norheim O . Availability, distribution and use of emergency obstetric care in northern Tanzania. Health Policy Plan. 2005; 20(3):167-75. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czi022. View