» Articles » PMID: 23519957

A Validation of the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test (CAST) Using a Latent Class Analysis of the DSM-IV Among Adolescents

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2013 Mar 23
PMID 23519957
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper explored the latent class structure of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) (assessed with the Munich Composite International Diagnostic Interview). Secondly, the screening properties of the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test (CAST) in adolescents were assessed with classical test theory using the latent class structure as empirical gold standard. The sample comprised 3266 French cannabis users aged 17 to 19 from the general population. Three latent classes of cannabis users were identified reflecting a continuum of problem severity: non-symptomatic, moderate and severe. Gender-specific analyses showed the best model fit, although results were almost identical in the total sample. The latent classes were good predictors of daily cannabis use, number of joints per day and age of first experimentation. The CAST showed good screening properties for the moderate/severe class (area under receiver operating characteristic curve > 0.85) and very good for the severe class (0.90). It was more sensitive for boys, more specific for girls. Although structural equivalence across gender was rejected, results suggest small gender differences in the latent structure of the DSM-IV. The performance of the CAST in screening for the latent class structure was good and superior to those obtained with the classical DSM-IV diagnoses.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and correlates of severe problematic cannabis use: analysis of a population-based survey in Jamaica.

Lalwani K, De La Haye W, Kerr K, Abel W, Sewell C Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1465963.

PMID: 39600793 PMC: 11588747. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1465963.


Psychometric properties of the cannabis abuse screening test (CAST) in a sample of Moroccans with cannabis use.

El Malki H, Moutawakkil S, El-Ammari A, Ragala M, El Hilaly J, El Gnaoui S Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024; 19(1):24.

PMID: 38570799 PMC: 10988931. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00459-5.


Development and Pilot Testing of an Experimental Cannabis Marketplace: Toward Evaluating the Impact of Cannabis Policy on Consumer Choices.

Coughlin L, Jennings C, Hellman L, Florimbio A, Jannausch M, Bonar E Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2023; 9(3):e870-e877.

PMID: 37347989 PMC: 11304338. DOI: 10.1089/can.2022.0273.


Recreational Marijuana Use, Adolescent Cognitive Development, and Schizophrenia Susceptibility.

Ho B, Barry A, Koeppel J, Macleod J, Boyd A, David A Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023; 3(2):222-232.

PMID: 37124347 PMC: 10140454. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.01.008.


Risk Perception of Traffic Accidents Due to Alcohol and Marijuana Use in Mexican College Students.

Jimenez A, Brands B, Mann R, Saldivar G, Juarez-Loya A, Garbus P Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(7).

PMID: 37046936 PMC: 10094133. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11071009.


References
1.
Teesson M, Lynskey M, Manor B, Baillie A . The structure of cannabis dependence in the community. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002; 68(3):255-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00223-5. View

2.
Annaheim B, Scotto T, Gmel G . Revising the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) by means of Item Response Theory. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010; 19(3):142-55. PMC: 6878503. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.308. View

3.
Vandrey R, Budney A, Kamon J, Stanger C . Cannabis withdrawal in adolescent treatment seekers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005; 78(2):205-10. PMC: 1626354. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.11.001. View

4.
Piontek D, Kraus L, Legleye S, Buhringer G . The validity of DSM-IV cannabis abuse and dependence criteria in adolescents and the value of additional cannabis use indicators. Addiction. 2011; 106(6):1137-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03359.x. View

5.
Coffey C, Carlin J, Lynskey M, Li N, Patton G . Adolescent precursors of cannabis dependence: findings from the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study. Br J Psychiatry. 2003; 182:330-6. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.182.4.330. View