» Articles » PMID: 23517260

Providers' Perceptions of the Factors Influencing the Implementation of the New York State Mandatory HIV Testing Law in Two Urban Academic Emergency Departments

Overview
Journal Acad Emerg Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2013 Mar 23
PMID 23517260
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Of the 1.1 million people in the United States infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), more than 20% are unaware of their infection. To increase early diagnosis and treatment, New York State recently passed legislation mandating that HIV testing be offered to all patients, ages 13 to 64 years, receiving health care services. Implementation of this legislation is complex, especially in the emergency department (ED). This study explores ED providers' perceptions of the factors affecting the implementation of the law.

Methods: The authors conducted six focus group sessions and three in-depth interviews with ED health care providers from two New York City teaching hospitals. Sessions were audiotaped and transcribed. Data were coded and summarized thematically through an iterative process after each session.

Results: A total of 49 providers participated and data saturation was achieved. Six factors were identified that predispose a provider to offer an HIV test: 1) self-efficacy, 2) behavioral intention, 3) the testing process, 4) provider knowledge of the legislation, 5) type of HIV test, and 6) follow-up procedures. Five factors were identified that enable providers to offer an HIV test: 1) resources related to time, 2) space, 3) staff, 4) type of test, and 5) timing of the offer. Improving access to HIV testing, linkage to care, and public health were all key factors in reinforcing providers' desire to offer HIV tests. Concerns regarding overall cost saving and coverage for the test were indicated as barriers that needed to be resolved to reinforce the providers to offer an HIV test.

Conclusions: Understanding the factors influencing the practice of ED providers charged with carrying out this mandate is critical. Despite earlier research that indicated that offering HIV testing to ED patients is largely influenced by cost, this study found additional factors that are important to consider to effectively implementing HIV testing in the ED.

Citing Articles

Innovation and implementation determinants of HIV testing and linkage-to-care in the U.S.: a systematic review.

Zamantakis A, Merle J, Queiroz A, Zapata J, Deskins J, Pachicano A Implement Sci Commun. 2024; 5(1):111.

PMID: 39380128 PMC: 11462864. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00638-0.


Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of rapid HIV testing in Canadian Emergency Departments: a mixed methods study.

Kent J, Puchalski Ritchie L, Klaiman M, Dell E, Garnett M, Landes M CJEM. 2024; 26(7):463-471.

PMID: 38960973 DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00716-1.


Effect of Participative Web-Based Educational Modules on HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention Competency Among Medical Students: Single-Arm Interventional Study.

Grant W, Adan M, Samurkas C, Quigee D, Benitez J, Gray B JMIR Med Educ. 2023; 9:e42197.

PMID: 36692921 PMC: 9906317. DOI: 10.2196/42197.


Attitudes, practices and perceived barriers to hepatitis C screening among medical residents at a large urban academic medical center.

Winetsky D, Zucker J, Carnevale C, Theodore D, Scherer M, Sani F J Viral Hepat. 2019; 26(11):1355-1358.

PMID: 31325394 PMC: 6800582. DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13181.


'Just another vial…': a qualitative study to explore the acceptability and feasibility of routine blood-borne virus testing in an emergency department setting in the UK.

Cullen L, Grenfell P, Rodger A, Orkin C, Mandal S, Rhodes T BMJ Open. 2019; 9(4):e024085.

PMID: 31048425 PMC: 6501954. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024085.


References
1.
Apoola A, Brunt L . A randomised controlled study of mouth swab testing versus same day blood tests for HIV infection in young people attending a community drug service. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011; 30(1):101-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00208.x. View

2.
Kitzinger J . Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995; 311(7000):299-302. PMC: 2550365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299. View

3.
Olshaker J, Rathlev N . Emergency Department overcrowding and ambulance diversion: the impact and potential solutions of extended boarding of admitted patients in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2006; 30(3):351-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.05.023. View

4.
Mumma B, Suffoletto B . Less encouraging lessons from the front lines: barriers to implementation of an emergency department-based HIV screening program. Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 58(1 Suppl 1):S44-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.022. View

5.
Beckmann K, Melzer-Lange M, Cuene B, Dietz M, Havens P . The effectiveness of a follow-up program at improving HIV testing in a pediatric emergency department. WMJ. 2003; 101(8):30-4. View