» Articles » PMID: 23515273

Playing Nice: a Multi-methodological Study on the Effects of Social Conformity on Memory

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Mar 22
PMID 23515273
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conformity is an important aspect of social behavior. Two main motives have been identified: people may adapt their behavior to "play nice" despite knowing better (normative conformity) or they may accept the others' opinion as a valid source of information (informative conformity). Neuroimaging studies can help to distinguish between these two possibilities. Here, we present a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study on memory conformity in a real group situation. We investigated the effects of group pressure on activity in hippocampus and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) which likely support informative and normative memory conformity, respectively. Furthermore, we related the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs4680 [called Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met] on the gene coding for COMT to both behavior and fMRI activation. Homozygous Met-allele carriers (Val-) behaved more conformist than carriers of at least one Val-allele (Val+). In the neuroimaging data, we compared trials in which subjects were confronted with a majority of incorrect group responses to trials in which they were confronted with a majority of correct group responses. We found increased hippocampal activity when the majority of the group was correct, possibly indicating retrieval processes. Moreover, we observed enhanced activity in the ACC when the majority of the group was incorrect, suggesting that conformity was mostly normative. Most interestingly, this latter effect was more pronounced for Val- as compared to Val+ participants. This offers a speculative explanation for the higher behavioral levels of social conformity in Val- allele carriers, because their subjectively perceived conflict in the presence of an incorrect group majority may have been higher. Overall, this study demonstrates how the mechanisms leading to complex social behavior such as conformity can be studied by combining genetic analyses and fMRI in social neuroscience paradigms.

Citing Articles

Exploring the effects of risk-taking, exploitation, and exploration on divergent thinking under group dynamics.

Harada T Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1063525.

PMID: 36743628 PMC: 9890061. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1063525.


Three heads are better than two: Comparing learning properties and performances across individuals, dyads, and triads through a computational approach.

Harada T PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0252122.

PMID: 34138907 PMC: 8211165. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252122.


Modulating the Activity of vmPFC Regulates Informational Social Conformity: A tDCS Study.

Li Y, Wang J, Ye H, Luo J Front Psychol. 2020; 11:566977.

PMID: 33041931 PMC: 7527649. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566977.


The effects of information and social conformity on opinion change.

Mallinson D, Hatemi P PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0196600.

PMID: 29718958 PMC: 5931497. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196600.


The neuroscience of social conformity: implications for fundamental and applied research.

Stallen M, Sanfey A Front Neurosci. 2015; 9:337.

PMID: 26441509 PMC: 4585332. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00337.


References
1.
Blasi G, Mattay V, Bertolino A, Elvevag B, Callicott J, Das S . Effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase val158met genotype on attentional control. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(20):5038-45. PMC: 6724859. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0476-05.2005. View

2.
Poldrack R . Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 10(2):59-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004. View

3.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(1):273-89. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978. View

4.
Axmacher N, Elger C, Fell J . The specific contribution of neuroimaging versus neurophysiological data to understanding cognition. Behav Brain Res. 2009; 200(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.01.028. View

5.
Smolka M, Schumann G, Wrase J, Grusser S, Flor H, Mann K . Catechol-O-methyltransferase val158met genotype affects processing of emotional stimuli in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(4):836-42. PMC: 6725630. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1792-04.2005. View