» Articles » PMID: 23507899

Functional Articular Cartilage Repair: Here, Near, or is the Best Approach Not Yet Clear?

Overview
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2013 Mar 20
PMID 23507899
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this Review we describe three approaches for cartilage tissue repair at the rheumatology-orthopaedics interface: disease-modifying osteoarthritis (OA) drug (DMOAD) treatment; cell-based therapies, and intrinsic cartilage repair by joint distraction. DMOADs can slow the progression of joint damage. Cell-based therapies have evolved to do the same, through selection of the most potent cell types (and combinations thereof), as well as identification of permissive boundary conditions for indications. Joint distraction techniques, meanwhile, have now demonstrated the capacity to stimulate actual intrinsic tissue repair. Although this progress is promising, true biological joint reconstruction remains distant on the developmental pathway of 'regenerative medicine'. Prolonged functional repair--that is, cure of diseases such as OA--remains an unmet medical need and scientific challenge, for which comparative and constructive interaction between these physical, chemical and cellular approaches will be required. Careful selections of patients and combinations of approaches will need to be made and tested to demonstrate their cost-effectiveness. Only with such rational and integrated assessment of outcomes will the promising results of these approaches be consolidated in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Multifunctional injectable microspheres for osteoarthritis therapy via spatiotemporally modulating macrophage polarization and inflammation.

Qiu S, Shi Y, Zang H, Sun X, Wang Q, Fu X NPJ Regen Med. 2024; 9(1):22.

PMID: 39289387 PMC: 11408510. DOI: 10.1038/s41536-024-00368-w.


Cartilage tissue healing and regeneration based on biocompatible materials: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis from 1993 to 2022.

Yao M, Zhang Y, Liu W, Wang H, Ren C, Zhang Y Front Pharmacol. 2024; 14:1276849.

PMID: 38239192 PMC: 10794889. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1276849.


Mechanical osteoarthritis of the hip in a one medicine concept: a narrative review.

Tome I, Alves-Pimenta S, Sargo R, Pereira J, Colaco B, Brancal H BMC Vet Res. 2023; 19(1):222.

PMID: 37875898 PMC: 10599070. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-023-03777-z.


Failure of cartilage regeneration: emerging hypotheses and related therapeutic strategies.

Muthu S, Korpershoek J, Novais E, Tawy G, Hollander A, Martin I Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023; 19(7):403-416.

PMID: 37296196 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-023-00979-5.


Quantitatively relating magnetic resonance and to glycosaminoglycan and collagen concentrations mediated by penetrated contrast agents and biomacromolecule-bound water.

Gao J, Xu X, Yu X, Fu Y, Zhang H, Gu S Regen Biomater. 2023; 10:rbad035.

PMID: 37206162 PMC: 10191676. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbad035.


References
1.
Henrotin Y, Labasse A, Zheng S, Galais P, Tsouderos Y, Crielaard J . Strontium ranelate increases cartilage matrix formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2001; 16(2):299-308. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.299. View

2.
Filardo G, Kon E, Di Martino A, Iacono F, Marcacci M . Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: a prospective 7-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(10):2153-60. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511415658. View

3.
Sawitzke A, Shi H, Finco M, Dunlop D, Bingham 3rd C, Harris C . The effect of glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulfate on the progression of knee osteoarthritis: a report from the glucosamine/chondroitin arthritis intervention trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58(10):3183-91. PMC: 2836125. DOI: 10.1002/art.23973. View

4.
Krzeski P, Buckland-Wright C, Balint G, Cline G, Stoner K, Lyon R . Development of musculoskeletal toxicity without clear benefit after administration of PG-116800, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, to patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007; 9(5):R109. PMC: 2212568. DOI: 10.1186/ar2315. View

5.
Clifford A, OConnell M, Gabriel S, Miller L, Block J . The KineSpring load absorber implant: rationale, design and biomechanical characterization. J Med Eng Technol. 2010; 35(1):65-71. DOI: 10.3109/03091902.2010.535592. View