» Articles » PMID: 23504558

Orthographic Consistency Affects Spoken Word Recognition at Different Grain-sizes

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Psychology
Date 2013 Mar 19
PMID 23504558
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A number of previous studies found that the consistency of sound-to-spelling mappings (feedback consistency) affects spoken word recognition. In auditory lexical decision experiments, words that can only be spelled one way are recognized faster than words with multiple potential spellings. Previous studies demonstrated this by manipulating feedback consistency of rhymes. The present lexical decision study, done in English, manipulated the spelling of individual vowels within consistent rhymes. Participants recognized words with consistent rhymes where the vowel has the most typical spelling (e.g., lobe) faster than words with consistent rhymes where the vowel has a less typical spelling (e.g., loaf). The present study extends previous literature by showing that auditory word recognition is affected by orthographic regularities at different grain sizes, just like written word recognition and spelling. The theoretical and methodological implications for future research in spoken word recognition are discussed.

Citing Articles

The English Sublexical Toolkit: Methods for indexing sound-spelling consistency.

Wiley R, Singh S, Baig Y, Key K, Purcell J Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(7):6826-6861.

PMID: 38594441 PMC: 11362297. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02395-3.

References
1.
Salverda A, Tanenhaus M . Tracking the time course of orthographic information in spoken-word recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010; 36(5):1108-17. PMC: 2933075. DOI: 10.1037/a0019901. View

2.
Ziegler J, Goswami U . Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol Bull. 2005; 131(1):3-29. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3. View

3.
Ziegler J, Petrova A, Ferrand L . Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: where do we stand after more than a decade?. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008; 34(3):643-61. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.643. View

4.
Perre L, Ziegler J . On-line activation of orthography in spoken word recognition. Brain Res. 2007; 1188:132-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.084. View

5.
Ventura P, Morais J, Kolinsky R . The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement. Cognition. 2007; 105(3):547-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.005. View