» Articles » PMID: 23503771

Kinematics Fingerprints of Leader and Follower Role-taking During Cooperative Joint Actions

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Mar 19
PMID 23503771
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Performing online complementary motor adjustments is quintessential to joint actions since it allows interacting people to coordinate efficiently and achieve a common goal. We sought to determine whether, during dyadic interactions, signaling strategies and simulative processes are differentially implemented on the basis of the interactional role played by each partner. To this aim, we recorded the kinematics of the right hand of pairs of individuals who were asked to grasp as synchronously as possible a bottle-shaped object according to an imitative or complementary action schedule. Task requirements implied an asymmetric role assignment so that participants performed the task acting either as (1) Leader (i.e., receiving auditory information regarding the goal of the task with indications about where to grasp the object) or (2) Follower (i.e., receiving instructions to coordinate their movements with their partner's by performing imitative or complementary actions). Results showed that, when acting as Leader, participants used signaling strategies to enhance the predictability of their movements. In particular, they selectively emphasized kinematic parameters and reduced movement variability to provide the partner with implicit cues regarding the action to be jointly performed. Thus, Leaders make their movements more "communicative" even when not explicitly instructed to do so. Moreover, only when acting in the role of Follower did participants tend to imitate the Leader, even in complementary actions where imitation is detrimental to joint performance. Our results show that mimicking and signaling are implemented in joint actions according to the interactional role of the agent, which in turn is reflected in the kinematics of each partner.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Human-Robot Collaboration Levels on Postural Stability During Working Tasks Performed While Standing: Experimental Study.

Bibbo D, Corvini G, Schmid M, Ranaldi S, Conforto S JMIR Hum Factors. 2025; 12:e64892.

PMID: 40014403 PMC: 11884379. DOI: 10.2196/64892.


Predictive Strategies for the Control of Complex Motor Skills: Recent Insights into Individual and Joint Actions.

Russo M, Maselli A, Sternad D, Pezzulo G ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39679272 PMC: 11643226.


Communicative modulations of early action components support the prediction of distal goals.

Dockendorff M, Schmitz L, Vesper C, Knoblich G PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0306072.

PMID: 38935629 PMC: 11210802. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306072.


Directed causal effect with PCMCI in hyperscanning EEG time series.

Silfwerbrand L, Koike Y, Nystrom P, Gingnell M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1305918.

PMID: 38686325 PMC: 11057377. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1305918.


Attention allocation in complementary joint action: How joint goals affect spatial orienting.

Schmitz L, Wahn B, Kruger M Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 86(5):1574-1593.

PMID: 37684501 PMC: 11557662. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02779-1.


References
1.
Jeannerod M . The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav. 1984; 16(3):235-54. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1984.10735319. View

2.
Vesper C, van der Wel R, Knoblich G, Sebanz N . Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 39(1):48-61. DOI: 10.1037/a0028066. View

3.
Tsai C, Kuo W, Hung D, Tzeng O . Action co-representation is tuned to other humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008; 20(11):2015-24. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20144. View

4.
Noy L, Dekel E, Alon U . The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(52):20947-52. PMC: 3248496. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1108155108. View

5.
Knoblich G, Jordan J . Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003; 29(5):1006-16. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.1006. View