» Articles » PMID: 23500670

Sex Differences and Structural Brain Maturation from Childhood to Early Adulthood

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2013 Mar 19
PMID 23500670
Citations 119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent advances in structural brain imaging have demonstrated that brain development continues through childhood and adolescence. In the present cross-sectional study, structural MRI data from 442 typically developing individuals (range 8-30) were analyzed to examine and replicate the relationship between age, sex, brain volumes, cortical thickness and surface area. Our findings show differential patterns for subcortical and cortical areas. Analysis of subcortical volumes showed that putamen volume decreased with age and thalamus volume increased with age. Independent of age, males demonstrated larger amygdala and thalamus volumes compared to females. Cerebral white matter increased linearly with age, at a faster pace for females than males. Gray matter showed nonlinear decreases with age. Sex-by-age interactions were primarily found in lobar surface area measurements, with males demonstrating a larger cortical surface up to age 15, while cortical surface in females remained relatively stable with increasing age. The current findings replicate some, but not all prior reports on structural brain development, which calls for more studies with large samples, replications, and specific tests for brain structural changes. In addition, the results point toward an important role for sex differences in brain development, specifically during the heterogeneous developmental phase of puberty.

Citing Articles

Protective and risk factors in daily life associated with cognitive decline of older adults.

Tong F, Yang H, Yu H, Sui L, Yao J, Shi C Front Aging Neurosci. 2025; 17:1496677.

PMID: 40078638 PMC: 11897038. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1496677.


Longitudinal Sex-at-Birth and Age Analyses of Cortical Structure in the ABCD Study.

Marshall A, Adise S, Kan E, Sowell E J Neurosci. 2025; 45(10).

PMID: 39843235 PMC: 11884399. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1091-24.2025.


Association between white matter microstructural changes and aggressiveness. A case-control diffusion tensor imaging study.

Seidenbecher S, Kaufmann J, Schone M, Dobrowolny H, Schiltz K, Frodl T Neuroimage Clin. 2024; 45:103712.

PMID: 39603043 PMC: 11626826. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103712.


Callous-unemotional traits, cognitive functioning, and externalizing problems in a propensity-matched sample from the ABCD study.

Murtha K, Perlstein S, Paz Y, Seidlitz J, Raine A, Hawes S J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024; 66(3):333-349.

PMID: 39496559 PMC: 11812496. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.14062.


Using Organoids to Model Sex Differences in the Human Brain.

Pavlinek A, Adhya D, Tsompanidis A, Warrier V, Vernon A, Lancaster M Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024; 4(5):100343.

PMID: 39092139 PMC: 11292257. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100343.


References
1.
Reuter M, Schmansky N, Rosas H, Fischl B . Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis. Neuroimage. 2012; 61(4):1402-18. PMC: 3389460. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.084. View

2.
Dale A, Fischl B, Sereno M . Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 1999; 9(2):179-94. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395. View

3.
Desikan R, Segonne F, Fischl B, Quinn B, Dickerson B, Blacker D . An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006; 31(3):968-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021. View

4.
Gogtay N, Nugent 3rd T, Herman D, Ordonez A, Greenstein D, Hayashi K . Dynamic mapping of normal human hippocampal development. Hippocampus. 2006; 16(8):664-72. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20193. View

5.
Han X, Jovicich J, Salat D, van der Kouwe A, Quinn B, Czanner S . Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: the effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer. Neuroimage. 2006; 32(1):180-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.051. View