Evaluation of Ranolazine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Stable Angina: Results from the TERISA Randomized Clinical Trial (Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina)
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: This study sought to examine the efficacy of ranolazine versus placebo on weekly angina frequency and sublingual nitroglycerin use in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease (CAD), and chronic stable angina who remain symptomatic despite treatment with up to 2 antianginal agents.
Background: Patients with diabetes have more extensive CAD than those without diabetes, and a high burden of angina. Ranolazine is not only effective in treating angina but also may improve glycemic control, thus providing several potential benefits in this high-risk group. We conducted a randomized trial to test the antianginal benefit of ranolazine in patients with diabetes and stable angina.
Methods: TERISA (Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina) was an international, randomized, double-blind trial of ranolazine versus placebo in patients with diabetes, CAD, and stable angina treated with 1 to 2 antianginals. After a single-blind, 4-week placebo run-in, patients were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind ranolazine (target dose 1000 mg bid) or placebo. Anginal episodes and nitroglycerin use were recorded with daily entry into a novel electronic diary. Primary outcome was the average weekly number of anginal episodes over the last 6 weeks of the study.
Results: A total of 949 patients were randomized across 104 centers in 14 countries. Mean age was 64 years, 61% were men, mean diabetes duration was 7.5 years, and mean baseline HbA1c was 7.3%. Electronic diary data capture was 98% in both groups. Weekly angina frequency was significantly lower with ranolazine versus placebo (3.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.6 to 4.1] episodes vs. 4.3 [95% CI: 4.0 to 4.5] episodes, p = 0.008), as was the weekly sublingual nitroglycerin use (1.7 [95% CI: 1.6 to 1.9] doses vs. 2.1 [95% CI: 1.9 to 2.3] doses, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of serious adverse events between groups.
Conclusions: Among patients with diabetes and chronic angina despite treatment with up to 2 agents, ranolazine reduced angina and sublingual nitroglycerin use and was well tolerated. (Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina [TERISA]; NCT01425359).
Olympios C, Stafylas P, Dermitzakis A, Efthimiadis I, Gardikiotis A, Kakouros S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).
PMID: 38541898 PMC: 10971156. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061672.
Management of Stable Angina in the Older Adult Population.
Nanna M, Wang S, Damluji A Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023; 16(4):e012438.
PMID: 36916288 PMC: 10121835. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012438.
Ueng K, Chiang C, Chao T, Wu Y, Lee W, Li Y Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023; 39(1):4-96.
PMID: 36685161 PMC: 9829849. DOI: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20221103A.
Ranolazine Attenuates Brain Inflammation in a Rat Model of Type 2 Diabetes.
Cassano V, Tallarico M, Armentaro G, De Sarro C, Iannone M, Leo A Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(24).
PMID: 36555798 PMC: 9782607. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232416160.
Angina in 2022: Current Perspectives.
Manfredi R, Verdoia M, Compagnucci P, Barbarossa A, Stronati G, Casella M J Clin Med. 2022; 11(23).
PMID: 36498466 PMC: 9737178. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236891.