» Articles » PMID: 23486222

Molecular Mechanisms Creating Bistable Switches at Cell Cycle Transitions

Overview
Journal Open Biol
Date 2013 Mar 15
PMID 23486222
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Progression through the eukaryotic cell cycle is characterized by specific transitions, where cells move irreversibly from stage i-1 of the cycle into stage i. These irreversible cell cycle transitions are regulated by underlying bistable switches, which share some common features. An inhibitory protein stalls progression, and an activatory protein promotes progression. The inhibitor and activator are locked in a double-negative feedback loop, creating a one-way toggle switch that guarantees an irreversible commitment to move forward through the cell cycle, and it opposes regression from stage i to stage i-1. In many cases, the activator is an enzyme that modifies the inhibitor in multiple steps, whereas the hypo-modified inhibitor binds strongly to the activator and resists its enzymatic activity. These interactions are the basis of a reaction motif that provides a simple and generic account of many characteristic properties of cell cycle transitions. To demonstrate this assertion, we apply the motif in detail to the G1/S transition in budding yeast and to the mitotic checkpoint in mammalian cells. Variations of the motif might support irreversible cellular decision-making in other contexts.

Citing Articles

Cell Cycle Complexity: Exploring the Structure of Persistent Subsystems in 414 Models.

Peter S, Josephraj A, Ibrahim B Biomedicines. 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39457646 PMC: 11505146. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12102334.


Dissecting reversible and irreversible single cell state transitions from gene regulatory networks.

Ramirez D, Lu M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39257745 PMC: 11384016. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.30.610498.


Cip1 tunes cell cycle arrest duration upon calcineurin activation.

Flynn M, Benanti J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(23):e2202469119.

PMID: 35653562 PMC: 9191682. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2202469119.


A modular approach for modeling the cell cycle based on functional response curves.

De Boeck J, Rombouts J, Gelens L PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(8):e1009008.

PMID: 34379640 PMC: 8382204. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009008.


Evolution of opposing regulatory interactions underlies the emergence of eukaryotic cell cycle checkpoints.

Hernansaiz-Ballesteros R, Foldi C, Cardelli L, Nagy L, Csikasz-Nagy A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):11122.

PMID: 34045495 PMC: 8159995. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90384-3.


References
1.
Chen K, Gyorffy B, VAL J, Novak B, Tyson J . Kinetic analysis of a molecular model of the budding yeast cell cycle. Mol Biol Cell. 2000; 11(1):369-91. PMC: 14780. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.11.1.369. View

2.
Uzunova K, Dye B, Schutz H, Ladurner R, Petzold G, Toyoda Y . APC15 mediates CDC20 autoubiquitylation by APC/C(MCC) and disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012; 19(11):1116-23. PMC: 3498062. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2412. View

3.
Ciliberto A, Capuani F, Tyson J . Modeling networks of coupled enzymatic reactions using the total quasi-steady state approximation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007; 3(3):e45. PMC: 1828705. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030045. View

4.
Yao G, Lee T, Mori S, Nevins J, You L . A bistable Rb-E2F switch underlies the restriction point. Nat Cell Biol. 2008; 10(4):476-82. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1711. View

5.
Mirchenko L, Uhlmann F . Sli15(INCENP) dephosphorylation prevents mitotic checkpoint reengagement due to loss of tension at anaphase onset. Curr Biol. 2010; 20(15):1396-401. PMC: 2964898. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.023. View