» Articles » PMID: 23483759

Presence of Differentiating Neuroblasts in Bone Marrow is a Favorable Prognostic Factor for Bone Marrow Metastatic Neuroblastoma at Diagnosis

Overview
Journal Ann Lab Med
Specialty Pathology
Date 2013 Mar 14
PMID 23483759
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The prognostic impact of the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in bone marrow (BM) remains unclear in BM metastatic neuroblastoma (NB). We aimed to identify the prognostic impact of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy.

Methods: A total of 51 patients diagnosed with BM metastatic NB at Asan Medical Center between January 1990 and July 2005 were enrolled. BM histology and laboratory data along with overall survival (OS) were compared with regard to the differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy.

Results: Among the 51 patients, 13 (25.5%) exhibited differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and 17/51 (33.3%) exhibited them after chemotherapy. The only significant difference among patient groups was the improved OS in patients with differentiated neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis (P=0.021). In contrast, the differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy did not affect OS (P=0.852).

Conclusions: Our study is the first report describing the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM. The presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis may be a favorable prognostic factor for patients with BM metastatic NB; however, the same phenomenon after chemotherapy is irrelevant to prognosis.

Citing Articles

amplification predicts poor prognosis based on interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of bone marrow cells in bone marrow metastases of neuroblastoma.

Yue Z, Huang C, Gao C, Xing T, Liu S, Li X Cancer Cell Int. 2017; 17:43.

PMID: 28367105 PMC: 5374581. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-017-0412-z.


Morphologic alteration of metastatic neuroblastic tumor in bone marrow after chemotherapy.

Bae G, Suh Y, Sung K, Kim J Korean J Pathol. 2013; 47(5):433-42.

PMID: 24255631 PMC: 3830990. DOI: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.5.433.

References
1.
Bagatell R, Rumcheva P, London W, Cohn S, Look A, Brodeur G . Outcomes of children with intermediate-risk neuroblastoma after treatment stratified by MYCN status and tumor cell ploidy. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(34):8819-27. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.2931. View

2.
Ogita S, Tokiwa K, Arizono N, Takahashi T . Neuroblastoma: incomplete differentiation on the way to maturation or morphological alteration resembling maturity?. Oncology. 1988; 45(3):148-52. DOI: 10.1159/000226552. View

3.
Reynolds C, Matthay K, Villablanca J, Maurer B . Retinoid therapy of high-risk neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2003; 197(1-2):185-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3835(03)00108-3. View

4.
Howman-Giles R, Shaw P, Uren R, Chung D . Neuroblastoma and other neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Nucl Med. 2007; 37(4):286-302. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2007.02.009. View

5.
Brodeur G, Seeger R, Barrett A, Berthold F, Castleberry R, DAngio G . International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 1988; 6(12):1874-81. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.12.1874. View