» Articles » PMID: 23482458

A Closer Look at the Second Demographic Transition in the U.S.: Evidence of Bidirectionality from a Cohort Perspective (1982-2006)

Overview
Date 2013 Mar 14
PMID 23482458
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Second demographic transition (SDT) theory posits that increased individualism and secularization have contributed to low fertility in Europe, but very little work has directly tested the salience of SDT theory to fertility trends in the U.S. Using longitudinal data from a nationally representative cohort of women who were followed throughout their reproductive years (NLSY79), this study examines the role of several key indicators of the second demographic transition (secularization, egalitarianism, religious affiliation, and female participation in the labor market) on fertility behavior over time (1982-2006). Analyses employ Poisson estimation, logistic regression, and cross-lagged structural equation models to observe unidirectional and bidirectional relationships over the reproductive life course. Findings lend support to the relevance of SDT theory in the U.S. but also provide evidence of "American bipolarity" which distinguishes the U.S. from the European case. Furthermore, analyses document the reciprocal nature of these relationships over time which has implications for how we understand these associations at the individual-level.

Citing Articles

Variants of Second Demographic Transition: Empirical Evidence from Young Women's Attitudes About Childbearing.

Marshall E, Shepherd H Popul Res Policy Rev. 2024; 41(6):2531-2554.

PMID: 39309366 PMC: 11415256. DOI: 10.1007/s11113-022-09738-y.


Ten-Year Trend in Women's Reasons for Abstaining or Limiting Drinking: The 2000 and 2010 United States National Alcohol Surveys.

Karriker-Jaffe K, Greenfield T, Mulia N, Zemore S J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018; 27(5):665-675.

PMID: 29634451 PMC: 5962333. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6613.


THE SECOND DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION THEORY: A Review and Appraisal.

Zaidi B, Morgan S Annu Rev Sociol. 2017; 43:473-492.

PMID: 28798523 PMC: 5548437. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053442.

References
1.
Morgan S . Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis?. Demography. 2003; 40(4):589-603. PMC: 2849155. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2003.0037. View

2.
Bumpass L . What's happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Demography. 1990; 27(4):483-98. View

3.
Martin J, Hamilton B, Sutton P, Ventura S, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S . Births: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006; 55(1):1-101. View

4.
Mosher W, Bachrach C . Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996; 28(1):4-12. View

5.
Guzzo K, Furstenberg Jr F . Multipartnered fertility among young women with a nonmarital first birth: prevalence and risk factors. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007; 39(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1363/3902907. View