» Articles » PMID: 23472194

Modeling Dengue Vector Dynamics Under Imperfect Detection: Three Years of Site-occupancy by Aedes Aegypti and Aedes Albopictus in Urban Amazonia

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Mar 9
PMID 23472194
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus are the vectors of dengue, the most important arboviral disease of humans. To date, Aedes ecology studies have assumed that the vectors are truly absent from sites where they are not detected; since no perfect detection method exists, this assumption is questionable. Imperfect detection may bias estimates of key vector surveillance/control parameters, including site-occupancy (infestation) rates and control intervention effects. We used a modeling approach that explicitly accounts for imperfect detection and a 38-month, 55-site detection/non-detection dataset to quantify the effects of municipality/state control interventions on Aedes site-occupancy dynamics, considering meteorological and dwelling-level covariates. Ae. aegypti site-occupancy estimates (mean 0.91; range 0.79-0.97) were much higher than reported by routine surveillance based on 'rapid larval surveys' (0.03; 0.02-0.11) and moderately higher than directly ascertained with oviposition traps (0.68; 0.50-0.91). Regular control campaigns based on breeding-site elimination had no measurable effects on the probabilities of dwelling infestation by dengue vectors. Site-occupancy fluctuated seasonally, mainly due to the negative effects of high maximum (Ae. aegypti) and minimum (Ae. albopictus) summer temperatures (June-September). Rainfall and dwelling-level covariates were poor predictors of occupancy. The marked contrast between our estimates of adult vector presence and the results from 'rapid larval surveys' suggests, together with the lack of effect of local control campaigns on infestation, that many Aedes breeding sites were overlooked by vector control agents in our study setting. Better sampling strategies are urgently needed, particularly for the reliable assessment of infestation rates in the context of control program management. The approach we present here, combining oviposition traps and site-occupancy models, could greatly contribute to that crucial aim.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Aedes aegypti control intervention with pyriproxyfen by lcWGS in Manacapuru, Amazonas, Brazil.

Leles L, Alvarez M, Cortes J, Alonso D, Ribolla P, Luz S PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(10):e0012547.

PMID: 39361714 PMC: 11478823. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012547.


Dirofilaria immitis is endemic in rural areas of the Brazilian Amazonas state capital, Manaus.

Barbosa U, Nava A, Ferreira Neto J, Dias C, Silva V, Mesquita H Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2023; 32(2):e000223.

PMID: 37132734 PMC: 10153491. DOI: 10.1590/S1984-29612023018.


Modeling Abundance of , a Candidate Vector, Indicates Nonrandom Hemorrhagic Disease Risk for White-Tailed Deer ().

Dinh E, Gomez J, Orange J, Morris M, Sayler K, McGregor B Viruses. 2021; 13(7).

PMID: 34372534 PMC: 8310359. DOI: 10.3390/v13071328.


American Mammals Susceptibility to Dengue According to Geographical, Environmental, and Phylogenetic Distances.

Robles-Fernandez A, Santiago-Alarcon D, Lira-Noriega A Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:604560.

PMID: 33778034 PMC: 7987674. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.604560.


Trypanosomatid infections in captive wild mammals and potential vectors at the Brasilia Zoo, Federal District, Brazil.

Reis F, Minuzzi-Souza T, Neiva M, Timbo R, de Morais I, de Lima T Vet Med Sci. 2019; 6(2):248-256.

PMID: 31743623 PMC: 7196675. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.216.


References
1.
Chadee D . Impact of pre-seasonal focal treatment on population densities of the mosquito Aedes aegypti in Trinidad, West Indies: a preliminary study. Acta Trop. 2008; 109(3):236-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.12.001. View

2.
Fe N, Barbosa M, Alecrim W, de Farias Guerra M . [Registration of the occurrence of Aedes albopictus in an urban zone in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil]. Rev Saude Publica. 2003; 37(5):674-5. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102003000500020. View

3.
Gratz N . Critical review of the vector status of Aedes albopictus. Med Vet Entomol. 2004; 18(3):215-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00513.x. View

4.
Wise de Valdez M, Nimmo D, Betz J, Gong H, James A, Alphey L . Genetic elimination of dengue vector mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(12):4772-5. PMC: 3064365. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1019295108. View

5.
Mogi M, Choochote W, Khamboonruang C, Suwanpanit P . Applicability of presence-absence and sequential sampling for ovitrap surveillance of Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Chiang Mai, northern Thailand. J Med Entomol. 1990; 27(4):509-14. DOI: 10.1093/jmedent/27.4.509. View