The Varying Role of the GP in the Pathway Between Colonoscopy and Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2013 Mar 9

PMID 23471608

Citations 3

Authors

David Goldsbury

Mark Harris

Shane Pascoe

Michael Barton

Ian Olver

Allan Spigelman

Justin Beilby

Craig Veitch

David Weller

Dianne L OConnell

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe general practitioner (GP) involvement in the treatment referral pathway for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Design: A retrospective cohort analysis of linked data.

Setting: A population-based sample of CRC patients diagnosed from August 2004 to December 2007 in New South Wales, Australia, using the 45 and Up Study, cancer registry diagnosis records, inpatient hospital records and Medicare claims records.

Participants: 407 CRC patients who had a colonoscopy followed by surgery.

Primary Outcome Measures: Patterns of GP consultations between colonoscopy and surgery (ie, between diagnosis and treatment). We investigated whether consulting a GP presurgery was associated with time to surgery, postsurgical GP consultations or rectal cancer cases having surgery in a centre with radiotherapy facilities.

Results: Of the 407 patients, 43% (n=175) had at least one GP consultation between colonoscopy and surgery. The median time from colonoscopy to surgery was 27 days for those with an intervening GP consultation and 15 days for those without the consultation. 55% (n=223) had a GP consultation up to 30 days postsurgery; it was more common in cases of patients who consulted a GP presurgery than for those who did not (65% and 47%, respectively, adjusted OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.50 to 4.89, p=0.001). Of the 142 rectal cancer cases, 23% (n=33) had their surgery in a centre with radiotherapy facilities, with no difference between those who did and did not consult a GP presurgery (21% and 25% respectively, adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.63, p=0.76).

Conclusions: Consulting a GP between colonoscopy and surgery was associated with a longer interval between diagnosis and treatment, and with further GP consultations postsurgery, but for rectal cancer cases it was not associated with treatment in a centre with radiotherapy facilities. GPs might require a more defined and systematic approach to CRC management.

Citing Articles

Perceptions of shared care among survivors of colorectal cancer from non-English-speaking and English-speaking backgrounds: a qualitative study.

Tan L, Gallego G, Nguyen T, Bokey L, Reath J BMC Fam Pract. 2018; 19(1):134.

PMID: 30060756 PMC: 6066922. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0822-6.

Using Large-Scale Linkage Data to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a National Educational Program on Antithrombotic Prescribing and Associated Stroke Prevention in Primary Care.

Liu Z, Moorin R, Worthington J, Tofler G, Bartlett M, Khan R J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(10).

PMID: 27737875 PMC: 5121477. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003729.

The Value of Continuity between Primary Care and Surgical Care in Colon Cancer.

Hussain T, Chang H, Luu N, Pollack C PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0155789.

PMID: 27219454 PMC: 4878733. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155789.

References

Rasic D, Belik S, Bolton J, Chochinov H, Sareen J . Cancer, mental disorders, suicidal ideation and attempts in a large community sample. Psychooncology. 2007; 17(7):660-7. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1292. View

Sorbye S, Risberg T, Norum J, Wist E . [Cancer patients' perception of the examination period prior to treatment]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998; 118(16):2468-70. View

Young J, Leong D, Armstrong K, OConnell D, Armstrong B, Spigelman A . Concordance with national guidelines for colorectal cancer care in New South Wales: a population-based patterns of care study. Med J Aust. 2007; 186(6):292-5. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00903.x. View

Harris M, Pascoe S, Crossland L, Beilby J, Veitch C, Spigelman A . Patients with colorectal cancer - a qualitative study of referral pathways and continuing care. Aust Fam Physician. 2012; 41(11):899-902. View

Mealing N, Banks E, Jorm L, Steel D, Clements M, Rogers K . Investigation of relative risk estimates from studies of the same population with contrasting response rates and designs. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:26. PMC: 2868856. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-26. View

Gruen R, Pitt V, Green S, Parkhill A, Campbell D, Jolley D . The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59(3):192-211. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20018. View

Barrett J, Jiwa M, Rose P, Hamilton W . Pathways to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an observational study in three UK cities. Fam Pract. 2005; 23(1):15-9. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmi093. View

Walsh J, Young J, Harrison J, Butow P, Solomon M, Masya L . What is important in cancer care coordination? A qualitative investigation. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010; 20(2):220-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01187.x. View

Selby P, Gillis C, Haward R . Benefits from specialised cancer care. Lancet. 1996; 348(9023):313-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)02482-8. View

10.

Risberg T, Sorbye S, Norum J, Wist E . Diagnostic delay causes more psychological distress in female than in male cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 1996; 16(2):995-9. View

11.

Klabunde C, Ambs A, Keating N, He Y, Doucette W, Tisnado D . The role of primary care physicians in cancer care. J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24(9):1029-36. PMC: 2726889. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1058-x. View

12.

Scott M, Knight A, Brown K, Novell J . A single common urgent pathway for all colorectal referrals reduces time to diagnosis and treatment. Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8(9):766-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01034.x. View

13.

Schrag D, Panageas K, Riedel E, Hsieh L, Bach P, Guillem J . Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection. J Surg Oncol. 2003; 83(2):68-78; discussion 78-9. DOI: 10.1002/jso.10244. View

14.

Charles J, Miller G, Ng A . GI malignancies in Australian general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2006; 35(4):186-7. View

15.

Banks E, Redman S, Jorm L, Armstrong B, Bauman A, Beard J . Cohort profile: the 45 and up study. Int J Epidemiol. 2007; 37(5):941-7. PMC: 2557061. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dym184. View

16.

Coyne J, Palmer S, Shapiro P, Thompson R, DeMichele A . Distress, psychiatric morbidity, and prescriptions for psychotropic medication in a breast cancer waiting room sample. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004; 26(2):121-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2003.08.012. View

17.

Harris M, Pascoe S, Crossland L, Beilby J, Veitch C, Spigelman A . Referral pathways in colorectal cancer: findings from a qualitative study in general practice. Med J Aust. 2011; 195(4):178. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03274.x. View

18.

Hoffmann D, Moore J, Roder D . Trends in survival from colonic cancer: the impact of subspecialization. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998; 67(12):842-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb07608.x. View

19.

Banou E, Hobfoll S, Trochelman R . Loss of resources as mediators between interpersonal trauma and traumatic and depressive symptoms among women with cancer. J Health Psychol. 2009; 14(2):200-14. DOI: 10.1177/1359105308100204. View

20.

Hillner B, Smith T, Desch C . Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18(11):2327-40. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.11.2327. View