Duplication and Concerted Evolution in a Master Sex Determiner Under Balancing Selection

Overview

Journal Proc Biol Sci

Specialty Biology

Date 2013 Mar 8

PMID 23466984

Citations 10

Authors

Eyal Privman

Yannick Wurm

Laurent Keller

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The transformer (tra) gene is a key regulator in the signalling hierarchy controlling all aspects of somatic sexual differentiation in Drosophila and other insects. Here, we show that six of the seven sequenced ants have two copies of tra. Surprisingly, the two paralogues are always more similar within species than among species. Comparative sequence analyses indicate that this pattern is owing to the ongoing concerted evolution after an ancestral duplication rather than independent duplications in each of the six species. In particular, there was strong support for inter-locus recombination between the paralogues of the ant Atta cephalotes. In the five species where the location of paralogues is known, they are adjacent to each other in four cases and separated by only few genes in the fifth case. Because there have been extensive genomic rearrangements in these lineages, this suggests selection acting to conserve their synteny. In three species, we also find a signature of positive selection in one of the paralogues. In three bee species where information is available, the tra gene is also duplicated, the copies are adjacent and in at least one species there was recombination between paralogues. These results suggest that concerted evolution plays an adaptive role in the evolution of this gene family.

Citing Articles

Heterozygosity at a conserved candidate sex determination locus is associated with female development in the clonal raider ant.

Lacy K, Lee J, Rozen-Gagnon K, Wang W, Carroll T, Kronauer D bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975376 PMC: 11838215. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.24.634795.

Theme and variation in the evolution of insect sex determination.

Laslo M, Just J, Angelini D J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2022; 340(2):162-181.

PMID: 35239250 PMC: 10078687. DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.23125.

Genome Showcases the Potential of Linked-Read Sequencing in Identifying a Putative Gene.

Ferguson K, Pannebakker B, Centurion A, van den Heuvel J, Nieuwenhuis R, Becker F Genes (Basel). 2020; 11(12).

PMID: 33255162 PMC: 7759789. DOI: 10.3390/genes11121390.

Genomic insights into mite phylogeny, fitness, development, and reproduction.

Zhang Y, Chen X, Wang J, Zhang Z, Wei H, Yu H BMC Genomics. 2019; 20(1):954.

PMID: 31818245 PMC: 6902594. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6281-1.

Fire ant social chromosomes: Differences in number, sequence and expression of odorant binding proteins.

Pracana R, Levantis I, Martinez-Ruiz C, Stolle E, Priyam A, Wurm Y Evol Lett. 2018; 1(4):199-210.

PMID: 30283649 PMC: 6121795. DOI: 10.1002/evl3.22.

References

Posada D, Crandall K . Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(24):13757-62. PMC: 61114. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.241370698. View

Smith C, Smith C, Robertson H, Helmkampf M, Zimin A, Yandell M . Draft genome of the red harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(14):5667-72. PMC: 3078412. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007901108. View

Brady S, Schultz T, Fisher B, Ward P . Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(48):18172-7. PMC: 1838725. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605858103. View

Privman E, Penn O, Pupko T . Improving the performance of positive selection inference by filtering unreliable alignment regions. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 29(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr177. View

Yang Z . PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24(8):1586-91. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm088. View

Shimodaira H . An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst Biol. 2002; 51(3):492-508. DOI: 10.1080/10635150290069913. View

Carrington M . Recombination within the human MHC. Immunol Rev. 1999; 167:245-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1999.tb01397.x. View

Deitsch K, Moxon E, Wellems T . Shared themes of antigenic variation and virulence in bacterial, protozoal, and fungal infections. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997; 61(3):281-93. PMC: 232611. DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.61.3.281-293.1997. View

Beye M . The dice of fate: the csd gene and how its allelic composition regulates sexual development in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Bioessays. 2004; 26(10):1131-9. DOI: 10.1002/bies.20098. View

10.

Smith J . Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol. 1992; 34(2):126-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00182389. View

11.

Martin D, Posada D, Crandall K, Williamson C . A modified bootscan algorithm for automated identification of recombinant sequences and recombination breakpoints. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005; 21(1):98-102. DOI: 10.1089/aid.2005.21.98. View

12.

Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M . CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics. 2001; 17(12):1246-7. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1246. View

13.

Penn O, Privman E, Landan G, Graur D, Pupko T . An alignment confidence score capturing robustness to guide tree uncertainty. Mol Biol Evol. 2010; 27(8):1759-67. PMC: 2908709. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq066. View

14.

Martin D, Rybicki E . RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics. 2000; 16(6):562-3. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.6.562. View

15.

Smith N, Smith J, Spratt B . Sequence evolution of the porB gene of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis: evidence of positive Darwinian selection. Mol Biol Evol. 1995; 12(3):363-70. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040212. View

16.

Fletcher W, Yang Z . The effect of insertions, deletions, and alignment errors on the branch-site test of positive selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2010; 27(10):2257-67. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq115. View

17.

Hasselmann M, Gempe T, Schiott M, Nunes-Silva C, Otte M, Beye M . Evidence for the evolutionary nascence of a novel sex determination pathway in honeybees. Nature. 2008; 454(7203):519-22. DOI: 10.1038/nature07052. View

18.

Lewis S, Searle S, Harris N, Gibson M, Lyer V, Richter J . Apollo: a sequence annotation editor. Genome Biol. 2003; 3(12):RESEARCH0082. PMC: 151184. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0082. View

19.

Hagblom P, Segal E, Billyard E, So M . Intragenic recombination leads to pilus antigenic variation in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Nature. 1985; 315(6015):156-8. DOI: 10.1038/315156a0. View

20.

Bay R, Bielawski J . Recombination detection under evolutionary scenarios relevant to functional divergence. J Mol Evol. 2012; 73(5-6):273-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00239-011-9473-0. View