» Articles » PMID: 23465742

Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Luteinising-hormone-releasing-hormone Agonists or Transdermal Oestrogen: the Randomised, Phase 2 MRC PATCH Trial (PR09)

Abstract

Background: Luteinising-hormone-releasing-hormone agonists (LHRHa) to treat prostate cancer are associated with long-term toxic effects, including osteoporosis. Use of parenteral oestrogen could avoid the long-term complications associated with LHRHa and the thromboembolic complications associated with oral oestrogen.

Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial, we enrolled men with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer scheduled to start indefinite hormone therapy. Randomisation was by minimisation, in a 2:1 ratio, to four self-administered oestrogen patches (100 μg per 24 h) changed twice weekly or LHRHa given according to local practice. After castrate testosterone concentrations were reached (1·7 nmol/L or lower) men received three oestrogen patches changed twice weekly. The primary outcome, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, was analysed by modified intention to treat and by therapy at the time of the event to account for treatment crossover in cases of disease progression. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00303784.

Findings: 85 patients were randomly assigned to receive LHRHa and 169 to receive oestrogen patches. All 85 patients started LHRHa, and 168 started oestrogen patches. At 3 months, 70 (93%) of 75 receiving LHRHa and 111 (92%) of 121 receiving oestrogen had achieved castrate testosterone concentrations. After a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR 12-31), 24 cardiovascular events were reported, six events in six (7·1%) men in the LHRHa group (95% CI 2·7-14·9) and 18 events in 17 (10·1%) men in the oestrogen-patch group (6·0-15·6). Nine (50%) of 18 events in the oestrogen group occurred after crossover to LHRHa. Mean 12-month changes in fasting glucose concentrations were 0·33 mmol/L (5·5%) in the LHRHa group and -0·16 mmol/L (-2·4%) in the oestrogen-patch group (p=0·004), and for fasting cholesterol were 0·20 mmol/L (4·1%) and -0·23 mmol/L (-3·3%), respectively (p<0·0001). Other adverse events reported by 6 months included gynaecomastia (15 [19%] of 78 patients in the LHRHa group vs 104 [75%] of 138 in the oestrogen-patch group), hot flushes (44 [56%] vs 35 [25%]), and dermatological problems (10 [13%] vs 58 [42%]).

Interpretation: Parenteral oestrogen could be a potential alternative to LHRHa in management of prostate cancer if efficacy is confirmed. On the basis of our findings, enrolment in the PATCH trial has been extended, with a primary outcome of progression-free survival.

Funding: Cancer Research UK, MRC Clinical Trials Unit.

Citing Articles

The Pros and Cons of Estrogens in Prostate Cancer: An Update with a Focus on Phytoestrogens.

Figueira M, Carvalho T, Macario-Monteiro J, Cardoso H, Correia S, Vaz C Biomedicines. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39200101 PMC: 11351860. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081636.


A Repurposing Programme Evaluating Transdermal Oestradiol Patches for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer Within the PATCH and STAMPEDE Trials: Current Results and Adapting Trial Design.

Gilbert D, Nankivell M, Rush H, Clarke N, Mangar S, Al-Hasso A Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023; 36(1):e11-e19.

PMID: 37973477 PMC: 7617162. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.10.054.


Androgen-deprivation therapy with leuprolide increases abdominal adiposity without causing cardiac dysfunction in middle-aged male mice: effect of sildenafil.

Xi L, Kraskauskas D, Muniyan S, Batra S, Kukreja R Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2023; 324(4):R589-R600.

PMID: 36878484 PMC: 10069980. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00259.2022.


Testosterone suppression combined with high dose estrogen as potential treatment of SARS-CoV-2. A mini review.

Coelingh Bennink H, Egberts J, Debruyne F Heliyon. 2022; 8(12):e12376.

PMID: 36540359 PMC: 9754753. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12376.


Estetrol Prevents Hot Flushes and Improves Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy: The PCombi Study.

Zimmerman Y, Frydenberg M, van Poppel H, Jeroen A van Moorselaar R, Roos E, Somford D Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022; 45:59-67.

PMID: 36353657 PMC: 9637725. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.006.


References
1.
Smith M, Lee H, Nathan D . Insulin sensitivity during combined androgen blockade for prostate cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91(4):1305-8. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2005-2507. View

2.
Hedlund P, Damber J, Hagerman I, Haukaas S, Henriksson P, Iversen P . Parenteral estrogen versus combined androgen deprivation in the treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer: part 2. Final evaluation of the Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group (SPCG) Study No. 5. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008; 42(3):220-9. DOI: 10.1080/00365590801943274. View

3.
Abrahamsen B, Nielsen M, Eskildsen P, Andersen J, Walter S, Brixen K . Fracture risk in Danish men with prostate cancer: a nationwide register study. BJU Int. 2007; 100(4):749-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07163.x. View

4.
Van Hemelrijck M, Garmo H, Holmberg L, Ingelsson E, Bratt O, Bill-Axelson A . Absolute and relative risk of cardiovascular disease in men with prostate cancer: results from the Population-Based PCBaSe Sweden. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(21):3448-56. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1567. View

5.
Godsland I . Oestrogens and insulin secretion. Diabetologia. 2005; 48(11):2213-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-005-1930-0. View