» Articles » PMID: 23465168

A Report of 918 Cases of Circumcision with the Shang Ring: Comparison Between Children and Adults

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2013 Mar 8
PMID 23465168
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical outcome and surgical complications in circumcision using the Shang Ring between children and adults.

Methods: Circumcision using the Shang Ring was performed on 702 adults and 216 children. Comparative analysis on indices including operative time, healing time, postoperative edema, postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, and postoperative infection was conducted.

Results: When the ring was removed after surgery, the pain was tolerable in the adult group, but more substantial in the child group. The optimal time for removing the ring was 2 weeks after surgery.

Conclusion: Special attention to the pain management is needed when using the Shang Ring to treat redundant foreskin or phimosis in children. The timing of the ring removal is critical to avoiding complications. Surgeons' knowledge in urology is also critical to the clinical outcome.

Citing Articles

Phimosis in Adults: Narrative Review of the New Available Devices and the Standard Treatments.

Rosato E, Miano R, Germani S, Asimakopoulos A Clin Pract. 2024; 14(1):361-376.

PMID: 38391414 PMC: 10887835. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14010028.


Clinical Outcomes And Risk Factors In Patients Circumcised By Chinese Shang Ring: A Prospective Study Based On Age And Types Of Penile Disease.

Wang H, Huang Z, Zhou J, Zhang X, Liang C Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019; 15:1233-1241.

PMID: 31695396 PMC: 6814311. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S215471.


Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study.

Han H, Xie D, Zhou X, Zhang X Int Braz J Urol. 2016; 43(4):736-745.

PMID: 27819755 PMC: 5557451. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0204.


Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Jin X, Lu J, Liu W, Zhou J, Yu R, Yu B Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015; 48(6):577-82.

PMID: 25831203 PMC: 4470318. DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20154530.


SmartClamp circumcision versus conventional dissection technique in terms of parental anxiety and outcomes: A prospective clinical study.

Karadag M, Cecen K, Demir A, Kivrak Y, Bagcioglu M, Kocaaslan R Can Urol Assoc J. 2015; 9(1-2):E10-3.

PMID: 25624960 PMC: 4301962. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2131.