» Articles » PMID: 23465098

Comparison of Outcomes of Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Versus Without Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (from the Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction...

Overview
Journal Am J Cardiol
Date 2013 Mar 8
PMID 23465098
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present substudy from the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial assessed the outcomes and their relation to different antithrombotic regimens in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Of 3,599 patients with information regarding a history of CABG, 105 (2.9%) had previously undergone CABG. Of these 105 patients, 46 were randomized to heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor and 59 to bivalirudin. The patients with versus without previous CABG were less frequently triaged to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (83.8% vs 93.2%, p = 0.0002) and had a longer door-to-balloon time (median 1.9 vs 1.6 hours, p = 0.047), lower rates of final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 2 to 3 in the intervened vessel (92.6% vs 97.8%, p = 0.007), and less frequent rates of complete or partial ST-segment resolution (66.3% vs 77.6%, p = 0.019). At 3 years, previous CABG was associated with a significantly greater incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (36.4% vs 21.4%, p <0.001) owing to greater rates of mortality (11.2% vs 6.7%, p = 0.08), reinfarction (11.6% vs 7.1%, p = 0.09), stroke (5.1% vs 1.8%, p = 0.013), and ischemic target vessel revascularization (23.6% vs 12.9%, p = 0.005). The outcomes did not differ significantly as a function of the antithrombotic regimen. On multivariate analysis, previous CABG was an independent predictor of 3-year ischemic stroke (hazard ratio 3.57, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 11.66). Intervention on the saphenous vein graft versus the native vessel predicted 3-year major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 2.69, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 6.19). In the HORIZONS-AMI trial, previous CABG was associated with a delay to mechanical reperfusion and lower rates of percutaneous coronary intervention and patency of the infarct related vessel along with worse clinical outcomes.

Citing Articles

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Farag M, Brilakis E, Gasparini G, Spratt J, Egred M Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(7):232.

PMID: 39076928 PMC: 11266800. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2307232.


Percutaneous coronary intervention of totally occluded coronary venous bypass grafts: An exercise in futility?.

Nardone E, Madsen B, McCarey M, Fischman D, Ruggiero N, Walinsky P World J Cardiol. 2021; 13(9):493-502.

PMID: 34621494 PMC: 8462047. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i9.493.


Long-Term Outcome of Consecutive Patients With Previous Coronary Bypass Surgery, Treated With Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.

van der Heijden L, Kok M, Zocca P, Sen H, Lowik M, Mariani S J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7(3).

PMID: 29382666 PMC: 5850240. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007212.


Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients with Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Presenting with STsegment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Garg P, Kamaruddin H, Iqbal J, Wheeldon N Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2016; 9:99-104.

PMID: 27006712 PMC: 4768661. DOI: 10.2174/1874192401509010099.