» Articles » PMID: 23458171

Quantification of the Uptake of Silver Nanoparticles and Ions to HepG2 Cells

Overview
Date 2013 Mar 6
PMID 23458171
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The toxic mechanism of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) is still debating, partially because of the common co-occurrence and the lack of methods for separation of AgNPs and Ag(+) in biological matrices. For the first time, Triton-X 114-based cloud point extraction (CPE) was proposed to separate AgNPs and Ag(+) in the cell lysates of exposed HepG2 cells. Cell lysates were subjected to CPE after adding Na2S2O3, which facilitated the transfer of AgNPs into the nether Triton X-114-rich phase by salt effect and the preserve of Ag(+) in the upper aqueous phase through the formation of hydrophilic complex. Then the AgNP and Ag(+) contents in the exposed cells were determined by ICP-MS after microwave digestion of the two phases, respectively. Under the optimized conditions, over 67% of AgNPs in cell lysates were extracted into the Triton X-114-rich phase while 94% of Ag(+) remained in the aqueous phase, and the limits of detection for AgNPs and Ag(+) were 2.94 μg/L and 2.40 μg/L, respectively. This developed analytical method was applied to quantify the uptake of AgNPs to the HepG2 cells. After exposure to 10 mg/L AgNPs for 24 h, about 67.8 ng Ag were assimilated per 10(4) cells, in which about 10.3% silver existed as Ag(+). Compared to the pristine AgNPs (with 5.2% Ag(+)) for exposure, the higher ratio of Ag(+) to AgNPs in the exposed cells (10.3% Ag(+)) suggests the transformation of AgNPs into Ag(+) in the cells and/or the higher uptake rate of Ag(+) than that of AgNPs. Given that the toxicity of Ag(+) is much higher than that of AgNPs, the substantial content of Ag(+) in the exposed cells suggests that the contribution of Ag(+) should be taken into account in evaluating the toxicity of AgNPs to organisms, and previous results obtained by regarding the total Ag content in organisms as AgNPs should be reconsidered.

Citing Articles

Nanoparticulate pollutants in the environment: Analytical methods, formation, and transformation.

Yu S, Tan Z, Lai Y, Li Q, Liu J Eco Environ Health. 2023; 2(2):61-73.

PMID: 38075291 PMC: 10702925. DOI: 10.1016/j.eehl.2023.04.005.


The State of the Art and Challenges of In Vitro Methods for Human Hazard Assessment of Nanomaterials in the Context of Safe-by-Design.

Ruijter N, Soeteman-Hernandez L, Carriere M, Boyles M, McLean P, Catalan J Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36770432 PMC: 9920318. DOI: 10.3390/nano13030472.


Isolation methods for particle protein corona complexes from protein-rich matrices.

Bohmert L, Voss L, Stock V, Braeuning A, Lampen A, Sieg H Nanoscale Adv. 2022; 2(2):563-582.

PMID: 36133244 PMC: 9417621. DOI: 10.1039/c9na00537d.


Size-Dependent Cytoprotective Effects of Selenium Nanoparticles during Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation in Brain Cortical Cells.

Varlamova E, Gudkov S, Plotnikov E, Turovsky E Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(13).

PMID: 35806466 PMC: 9267189. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137464.


Minimizing the Silver Free Ion Content in Starch Coated Silver Nanoparticle Suspensions with Exchange Cationic Resins.

Martins C, Araujo A, de Gouveia L, Prior J Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35214974 PMC: 8877803. DOI: 10.3390/nano12040644.