» Articles » PMID: 23457502

A Systematic Review of Reported Cost for Smear and Culture Tests During Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis Treatment

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Mar 5
PMID 23457502
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In 2011, World Health Organization revised its recommendation for microbiological monitoring during treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) by increasing the frequency of culture examination from quarterly to monthly after culture conversion. Implementing the recommendation requires substantial additional investment in laboratory infrastructure. The objective of this review is to provide cost evidence that is needed for national TB programs to budget for optimal monitoring strategies.

Methods And Findings: WE CONDUCTED THE FIRST SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON UNIT COST ESTIMATES OF THREE MONITORING STRATEGIES: 1) smear only; 2) culture only; 3) combined smear and culture. 26 peer-reviewed studies were selected by searching 10 databases in English and Chinese for literature published between 1995 and 2012. Cost estimates were converted into 2010 constant USD and international dollars. We assessed the quality of the estimates using a matrix with five essential elements and provided a cost projection for the combined smear and culture tests where the data were available. The 26 studies reported the cost estimates in 16 predominantly high- or middle-income countries from 1993 to 2009. The estimated unit cost for smear, culture, and combined tests ranges from $0.26 to $10.50, $1.63 to $62.01, and $26.73 to $39.57, respectively. The ratio of culture to smear costs varies from 1.35 to 11.98. The wide range of estimates is likely attributable to using different laboratory methods in different regions and years and differing practices in collecting and reporting cost data. Most studies did not report information critical for generalizing their conclusions.

Conclusion: The paucity and low quality of unit cost estimates for TB monitoring in resource-poor settings impose technical challenges in predicting the resources needed for strengthening microbiological monitoring. To improve the validity and comparability of the cost data, we strongly advocate the data collection, estimation, and reporting follow protocols proposed by WHO.

Citing Articles

Multicenter Testing of a Simple Molecular Diagnostic System for the Diagnosis of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis.

Lee H, Kim N, Lee E, Yoon Y, Jeong Y, Lee B Biosensors (Basel). 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36832025 PMC: 9954000. DOI: 10.3390/bios13020259.


Cost of TB services: approach and summary findings of a multi-country study (Value TB).

Sweeney S, Laurence Y, Cunnama L, Gomez G, Garcia-Baena I, Bhide P Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022; 26(11):1006-1015.

PMID: 36281042 PMC: 9621303. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.22.0096.


Comparative assessment of the cost-effectiveness of Tuberculosis (TB) active case-finding interventions: A systematic analysis of TB REACH wave 5 projects.

Gomes I, Dong C, Vandewalle P, Khan A, Creswell J, Dowdy D PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0270816.

PMID: 36156080 PMC: 9512197. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270816.


Female Genital Tuberculosis Among Infertile Women and Its Contributions to Primary and Secondary Infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ahmed M, Mohammed A, Ilesanmi A, Aimakhu C, Bakhiet A, Hamad S Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022; 22(3):314-324.

PMID: 36072071 PMC: 9423760. DOI: 10.18295/squmj.1.2022.003.


Profiles of Volatile Biomarkers Detect Tuberculosis from Skin.

Vishinkin R, Busool R, Mansour E, Fish F, Esmail A, Kumar P Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021; 8(15):e2100235.

PMID: 34075714 PMC: 8336503. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202100235.


References
1.
Cuevas L, Yassin M, Al-Sonboli N, Lawson L, Arbide I, Al-Aghbari N . A multi-country non-inferiority cluster randomized trial of frontloaded smear microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. PLoS Med. 2011; 8(7):e1000443. PMC: 3134460. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000443. View

2.
Suarez P, Floyd K, Portocarrero J, Alarcon E, Rapiti E, Ramos G . Feasibility and cost-effectiveness of standardised second-line drug treatment for chronic tuberculosis patients: a national cohort study in Peru. Lancet. 2002; 359(9322):1980-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08830-X. View

3.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336(7650):924-6. PMC: 2335261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. View

4.
Okello D, Floyd K, Adatu F, Odeke R, Gargioni G . Cost and cost-effectiveness of community-based care for tuberculosis patients in rural Uganda. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003; 7(9 Suppl 1):S72-9. View

5.
Mueller D, Mwenge L, Muyoyeta M, Muvwimi M, Tembwe R, McNerney R . Costs and cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis cultures using solid and liquid media in a developing country. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008; 12(10):1196-202. View