» Articles » PMID: 23456045

Competition Sensing: the Social Side of Bacterial Stress Responses

Overview
Date 2013 Mar 5
PMID 23456045
Citations 205
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The field of ecology has long recognized two types of competition: exploitative competition, which occurs indirectly through resource consumption, and interference competition, whereby one individual directly harms another. Here, we argue that these two forms of competition have played a dominant role in the evolution of bacterial regulatory networks. In particular, we argue that several of the major bacterial stress responses detect ecological competition by sensing nutrient limitation (exploitative competition) or direct cell damage (interference competition). We call this competition sensing: a physiological response that detects harm caused by other cells and that evolved, at least in part, for that purpose. A key prediction of our hypothesis is that bacteria will counter-attack when they sense ecological competition but not when they sense abiotic stress. In support of this hypothesis, we show that bacteriocins and antibiotics are frequently upregulated by stress responses to nutrient limitation and cell damage but very rarely upregulated by stress responses to heat or osmotic stress, which typically are not competition related. We argue that stress responses, in combination with the various mechanisms that sense secretions, enable bacteria to infer the presence of ecological competition and navigate the 'microbe-kill-microbe' world in which they live.

Citing Articles

Surface-mediated bacteriophage defense incurs fitness tradeoffs for interbacterial antagonism.

Tsai C, Wang F, Yang C, Yang L, Nguyen T, Chen Y EMBO J. 2025; .

PMID: 40065098 DOI: 10.1038/s44318-025-00406-3.


Pseudomonads coordinate innate defense against viruses and bacteria with a single regulatory system.

Brinkley D, Bertolli S, Gallagher L, Tan Y, de Silva M, Brockman A bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060533 PMC: 11888443. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.26.640152.


Interbacterial warfare in the human gut: insights from Bacteroidales' perspective.

Jiang K, Pang X, Li W, Xu X, Yang Y, Shang C Gut Microbes. 2025; 17(1):2473522.

PMID: 40038576 PMC: 11901371. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2473522.


Chloramphenicol-mobilized transiently expresses resistance to multiple antibiotics, including the glycopeptides phleomycin and bleomycin.

LaBonte S, Liu Y, Powers M, De Ford E, Straight P bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39868268 PMC: 11761127. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.13.632840.


An insight into the genome-wide analysis of bacterial defense mechanisms in a uropathogenic Morganella morganii isolate from Bangladesh.

Al Sium S, Goswami B, Chowdhury S, Naser S, Sarkar M, Faruq M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313141.

PMID: 39847570 PMC: 11756799. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313141.


References
1.
Wloch-Salamon D, Gerla D, Hoekstra R, de Visser J . Effect of dispersal and nutrient availability on the competitive ability of toxin-producing yeast. Proc Biol Sci. 2008; 275(1634):535-41. PMC: 2596812. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1461. View

2.
Braun V, Patzer S, Hantke K . Ton-dependent colicins and microcins: modular design and evolution. Biochimie. 2002; 84(5-6):365-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9084(02)01427-x. View

3.
Roth J, Kugelberg E, Reams A, Kofoid E, Andersson D . Origin of mutations under selection: the adaptive mutation controversy. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006; 60:477-501. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142045. View

4.
Foster K, Wenseleers T . A general model for the evolution of mutualisms. J Evol Biol. 2006; 19(4):1283-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01073.x. View

5.
Little A, Robinson C, Peterson S, Raffa K, Handelsman J . Rules of engagement: interspecies interactions that regulate microbial communities. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008; 62:375-401. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.micro.030608.101423. View