» Articles » PMID: 23450526

Anti-D Administration in Pregnancy for Preventing Rhesus Alloimmunisation

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2013 Mar 2
PMID 23450526
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: During pregnancy, a Rhesus negative (Rh-negative) woman may develop antibodies when her fetus is Rhesus positive (Rh-positive). These antibodies may harm Rh-positive babies.

Objectives: To assess the effects of antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin on the incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation when given to Rh-negative women without anti-D antibodies.

Search Methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2012).

Selection Criteria: Randomised trials in Rh-negative women without anti-D antibodies given anti-D after 28 weeks of pregnancy, compared with no treatment, placebo or a different regimen of anti-D.

Data Collection And Analysis: Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and extracted the data.

Main Results: Two trials with moderate to high risk of bias, involving over 4500 women, compared anti-D prophylaxis with no anti-D during pregnancy. When women received anti-D at 28 and 34 weeks' gestation, risks of immunisation were not significantly different than for women not given antenatal anti-D: risk ratio (RR) of immunisation during pregnancy was 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 1.17); after the birth of a Rh-positive infant the RR was 0.42 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.17); and within 12 months after birth of a Rh-positive infant the RR was 0.39 (95% CI 0.10 to 1.62).However, women receiving anti-D during pregnancy were significantly less likely to register a positive Kleihauer test (which detects fetal cells in maternal blood) in pregnancy (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88) and at the birth of a Rh-positive infant (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.79). No data were available for the risk of Rhesus D alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy. No significant differences were seen for neonatal jaundice, and no adverse effects were reported in either trial.

Authors' Conclusions: The risk of Rhesus D alloimmunisation during or immediately after a first pregnancy is about 1%. Administration of 100 µg (500 IU) anti-D to women in their first pregnancy can reduce this risk to about 0.2% without, to date, any adverse effects. Although unlikely to confer benefit in the current pregnancy, fewer women may have Rhesus D antibodies in any subsequent pregnancy, but the effects of this needs to be tested in studies of robust design.

Citing Articles

Antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and D antigen negativity in pregnant women of the UAE: a cross-sectional analysis from the Mutaba'ah Study.

Khair H, Muhallab S, Al Nuaimi M, Hilary S, Al Awar S, Zareba K BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e081309.

PMID: 39424387 PMC: 11492929. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081309.


Complement C3 and marginal zone B cells promote IgG-mediated enhancement of RBC alloimmunization in mice.

Jash A, Pridmore T, Collins J, Hay A, Hudson K, Luckey C J Clin Invest. 2024; 134(8).

PMID: 38618959 PMC: 11014669. DOI: 10.1172/JCI167665.


Following targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, almost half of the pregnant women had undetectable anti-D prophylaxis at delivery.

Sorensen K, Stjern H, Karlsen B, Tomter G, Ystad I, Herud I Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022; 101(4):431-440.

PMID: 35224728 PMC: 9564431. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14328.


Recommendation for validation and quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal blood groups and implications for IVD risk classification according to EU regulations.

Clausen F, Hellberg A, Bein G, Bugert P, Schwartz D, Dovc Drnovsek T Vox Sang. 2021; 117(2):157-165.

PMID: 34155647 PMC: 10686716. DOI: 10.1111/vox.13172.


FIGO/ICM guidelines for preventing Rhesus disease: A call to action.

H A Visser G, Thommesen T, Di Renzo G, Nassar A, Spitalnik S Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; 152(2):144-147.

PMID: 33128246 PMC: 7898700. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13459.