» Articles » PMID: 23437035

Detection of Genetic Diversity in Campylobacter Jejuni Isolated from a Commercial Turkey Flock Using FlaA Typing, MLST Analysis and Microarray Assay

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Feb 26
PMID 23437035
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Campylobacter is genetically highly diverse and undergoes frequent intraspecific recombination. Turkeys have been identified as an important reservoir for Campylobacter jejuni which is of public health significance. The assessment of the genetic diversity among Campylobacter population is critical for our understanding of the epidemiology of this bacterium. The genetic profiles were different according to the molecular typing methods used. The performance of established flaA genotyping, multilocus sequencing typing (MLST) and DNA microarray assay based on the ArrayTube™ technology was evaluated using 14 Campylobacter jejuni isolated from a commercial turkey flock. The flaA typing was performed using PCR-RFLP with restriction enzymes Sau3AI, AluI, a 'composite' flaA analysis of AluI and Sau3AI and DdeI. The 14 isolates were differentiated into 3, 5, 7 and 9 genotypes, respectively. Entire flaA gene and short variable region (SVR) sequences were analysed. Sequencing of the entire flaA provided 11 different genotypes. flaA-SVR sequence analysis detected 8 flaA alleles and 4 flaA peptides. One new flaA allele type (528) was identified. MLST analysis represented 10 different sequence types (STs) and 5 clonal complexes (CCs). The microarray assay recognised 14 different genotypes. The discriminatory indices were 0.560, 0.802, 0.857, and 0.912 for flaA-RFLP depending on the used enzymes, 0.890 for flaA-SVR, 0.967 for entire flaA sequencing, 0.945 for MLST and 1.00 for the DNA microarray assay. The flaA gene was genetically stable over 20 passages on blood agar. In conclusion, the different typing tools demonstrated a high level of genetic heterogeneity of Campylobacter jejuni in a turkey flock, indicating that a single flock can be infected by multiple genotypes within one rearing cycle. DNA microarray-based assays had the highest discriminatory power when compared with other genotyping tools.

Citing Articles

Comparative Genomic Analysis of Livestock-Derived : Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence, Mobile Genetic Elements, and Genetic Relatedness.

An J, Lee J, Cho S, Song H J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025; 35:e2411044.

PMID: 39947677 PMC: 11876010. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.2411.11044.


SVR-flaA typing of erythromycin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from poultry slaughterhouses in southern Brazil.

Dias T, de Almeida Figueira A, Alves Costa G, da Cunha N, Rossi D, de Melo R Braz J Microbiol. 2023; 54(2):1065-1073.

PMID: 37055624 PMC: 10234967. DOI: 10.1007/s42770-023-00969-5.


Genomic diversity and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. from humans and livestock in Nigeria.

Audu B, Norval S, Bruno L, Meenakshi R, Marion M, Forbes K J Biomed Sci. 2022; 29(1):7.

PMID: 35073916 PMC: 8788075. DOI: 10.1186/s12929-022-00786-2.


Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) Produced by Gram-Negative Bacteria in Trinidad and Tobago.

Akpaka P, Vaillant A, Wilson C, Jayaratne P Int J Microbiol. 2021; 2021:5582755.

PMID: 34475957 PMC: 8408010. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5582755.


Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, Virulence Genes, and Genetic Diversity of Thermophilic Species Isolated From a Layer Poultry Farm in Korea.

Gahamanyi N, Song D, Yoon K, Mboera L, Matee M, Mutangana D Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:622275.

PMID: 33859624 PMC: 8043113. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.622275.


References
1.
Chuma T, Makino K, Okamoto K, Yugi H . Analysis of distribution of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in broilers by using restriction fragment length polymorphism of flagellin gene. J Vet Med Sci. 1997; 59(11):1011-5. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.59.1011. View

2.
Parkhill J, Wren B, Mungall K, Ketley J, Churcher C, Basham D . The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature. 2000; 403(6770):665-8. DOI: 10.1038/35001088. View

3.
Volokhov D, Chizhikov V, Chumakov K, Rasooly A . Microarray-based identification of thermophilic Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41(9):4071-80. PMC: 193862. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4071-4080.2003. View

4.
Suerbaum S, Lohrengel M, Sonnevend A, Ruberg F, Kist M . Allelic diversity and recombination in Campylobacter jejuni. J Bacteriol. 2001; 183(8):2553-9. PMC: 95172. DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.8.2553-2559.2001. View

5.
Fouts D, Mongodin E, Mandrell R, Miller W, Rasko D, Ravel J . Major structural differences and novel potential virulence mechanisms from the genomes of multiple campylobacter species. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3(1):e15. PMC: 539331. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030015. View