Learning the Facts in Medical School is Not Enough: Which Factors Predict Successful Application of Procedural Knowledge in a Laboratory Setting?

Overview

Journal BMC Med Educ

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Medical Education

Date 2013 Feb 26

PMID 23433202

Citations 34

Authors

Ralf Schmidmaier

Stephan Eiber

Rene Ebersbach

Miriam Schiller

Inga Hege

Matthias Holzer

Martin R Fischer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Medical knowledge encompasses both conceptual (facts or "what" information) and procedural knowledge ("how" and "why" information). Conceptual knowledge is known to be an essential prerequisite for clinical problem solving. Primarily, medical students learn from textbooks and often struggle with the process of applying their conceptual knowledge to clinical problems. Recent studies address the question of how to foster the acquisition of procedural knowledge and its application in medical education. However, little is known about the factors which predict performance in procedural knowledge tasks. Which additional factors of the learner predict performance in procedural knowledge?

Methods: Domain specific conceptual knowledge (facts) in clinical nephrology was provided to 80 medical students (3rd to 5th year) using electronic flashcards in a laboratory setting. Learner characteristics were obtained by questionnaires. Procedural knowledge in clinical nephrology was assessed by key feature problems (KFP) and problem solving tasks (PST) reflecting strategic and conditional knowledge, respectively.

Results: Results in procedural knowledge tests (KFP and PST) correlated significantly with each other. In univariate analysis, performance in procedural knowledge (sum of KFP+PST) was significantly correlated with the results in (1) the conceptual knowledge test (CKT), (2) the intended future career as hospital based doctor, (3) the duration of clinical clerkships, and (4) the results in the written German National Medical Examination Part I on preclinical subjects (NME-I). After multiple regression analysis only clinical clerkship experience and NME-I performance remained independent influencing factors.

Conclusions: Performance in procedural knowledge tests seems independent from the degree of domain specific conceptual knowledge above a certain level. Procedural knowledge may be fostered by clinical experience. More attention should be paid to the interplay of individual clinical clerkship experiences and structured teaching of procedural knowledge and its assessment in medical education curricula.

Citing Articles

Improving students' performance via case-based e-learning.

Ertl S, Wadowski P, Loffler-Stastka H Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11():1401124.

PMID: 39835111 PMC: 11743159. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1401124.

A systematic review of medical practitioners' retention and application of basic sciences to clinical practice.

Albert F, Seidu A, Mason H, Anderson E, Alele F, Heggarty P BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):997.

PMID: 39272053 PMC: 11396528. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05952-8.

FINCA - a conceptual framework to improve interprofessional collaboration in health education and care.

Witti M, Zottmann J, Wershofen B, Thistlethwaite J, Fischer F, Fischer M Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1213300.

PMID: 37849484 PMC: 10577300. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1213300.

An analysis of the learning styles and attitudes of foreign students in a post-baccalaureate medical education program.

Hsu H, Sung T BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):497.

PMID: 37407964 PMC: 10324155. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04487-8.

An integrated pre-clerkship curriculum to build cognitive medical schema: It's not just about the content.

LeClair R, Cleveland J, Eden K, Binks A Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1148916.

PMID: 37008016 PMC: 10062186. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1148916.

References

Hissbach J, Klusmann D, Hampe W . Dimensionality and predictive validity of the HAM-Nat, a test of natural sciences for medical school admission. BMC Med Educ. 2011; 11:83. PMC: 3261109. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-83. View

Sobral D . What kind of motivation drives medical students' learning quests?. Med Educ. 2004; 38(9):950-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01913.x. View

Wilkinson T, Wells J, Bushnell J . Medical student characteristics associated with time in study: is spending more time always a good thing?. Med Teach. 2007; 29(2-3):106-10. DOI: 10.1080/01421590601175317. View

Bordage G, BRAILOVSKY C, Carretier H, Page G . Content validation of key features on a national examination of clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med. 1995; 70(4):276-81. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199504000-00010. View

Meterissian S . A novel method of assessing clinical reasoning in surgical residents. Surg Innov. 2006; 13(2):115-9. DOI: 10.1177/1553350606291042. View

Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L . Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ. 2002; 324(7343):952-7. PMC: 102330. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.952. View

Fischer M, Schauer S, Grasel C, Baehring T, Mandl H, Gartner R . [CASUS model trial. A computer-assisted author system for problem-oriented learning in medicine]. Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996; 90(5):385-9. View

Berner E, Graber M . Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med. 2008; 121(5 Suppl):S2-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.01.001. View

Norman G, Young M, Brooks L . Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: the role of experience. Med Educ. 2007; 41(12):1140-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02914.x. View

10.

Cohen-Schotanus J, Muijtjens A, Reinders J, Agsteribbe J, van Rossum H, van der Vleuten C . The predictive validity of grade point average scores in a partial lottery medical school admission system. Med Educ. 2006; 40(10):1012-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02561.x. View

11.

Moulaert V, Verwijnen M, Rikers R, Scherpbier A . The effects of deliberate practice in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2004; 38(10):1044-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01954.x. View

12.

Page G, Bordage G, Allen T . Developing key-feature problems and examinations to assess clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med. 1995; 70(3):194-201. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199503000-00009. View

13.

Boshuizen H, Van Der Vleuten C, Schmidt H . Measuring knowledge and clinical reasoning skills in a problem-based curriculum. Med Educ. 1997; 31(2):115-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb02469.x. View

14.

Hatala R, Norman G . Adapting the Key Features Examination for a clinical clerkship. Med Educ. 2002; 36(2):160-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01067.x. View

15.

Benbassat J, Baumal R . Uncertainties in the selection of applicants for medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007; 12(4):509-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-007-9076-0. View

16.

Price J, Williams G, Wiltshire E . Influence of motivational and demographic factors on performance in the medical course: a prospective study. Med Educ. 1994; 28(2):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02528.x. View

17.

Farmer E, Hinchy J . Assessing general practice clinical decision making skills: the key features approach. Aust Fam Physician. 2005; 34(12):1059-61. View

18.

Hampe W, Hissbach J, Kadmon M, Kadmon G, Klusmann D, Scheutzel P . [Who will be a good physician? Admission procedures for medical and dental students]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2009; 52(8):821-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-009-0905-6. View

19.

Schmidmaier R, Ebersbach R, Schiller M, Hege I, Holzer M, Fischer M . Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: retesting versus restudying. Med Educ. 2011; 45(11):1101-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04043.x. View

20.

Woodward C, McAuley R . Characteristics of medical students who choose primary care as a career: the McMaster experience. Can Med Assoc J. 1984; 130(2):129-31. PMC: 1875882. View