» Articles » PMID: 23424643

Effects of Physical Tracing on Estimates of Loss to Follow-up, Mortality and Retention in Low and Middle Income Country Antiretroviral Therapy Programs: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Feb 21
PMID 23424643
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A large proportion of patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low and middle income countries (LMICs) have unknown treatment outcomes and are classified as lost to follow-up (LTFU). Physical tracing of patients classified as LTFU is common; however, effects of tracing on outcomes remains unclear. The objective of this systematic review is to compare estimates of LTFU, mortality and retention in LMIC in cohorts of patients with and without physical tracing.

Methods And Findings: We systematically identified studies in LMIC programmatic settings using MEDLINE (2003-2011) and HIV conference abstracts (2009-2011). Studies reporting the proportion LTFU 12-months after ART initiation were included. Tracing activities were determined from manuscripts or by contacting study authors. Studies were classified as "tracing studies" if physical tracing was available for the majority of patients. Summary estimates from the 2 groups of studies (tracing and non-tracing) for LTFU, mortality, stop of ART, transfers out, and retention on ART were determined. 261 papers and 616 abstracts were identified of which 39 studies comprising 54 separate cohorts (n = 187,666) met inclusion criteria. Of those, physical tracing was available for 46% of cohorts. Treatment programs with physical tracing activities had lower estimated LTFU (7.6% vs. 15.1%; p<.001), higher estimated mortality (10.5% vs. 6.6%; p = .006), higher retention on ART (80.0 vs. 75.8%; p = .04) and higher retention at the original site (80.0% vs. 72.9%; p = .02).

Conclusions: Knowledge of patient tracing is critical when interpreting program outcomes of LTFU, mortality and retention. The reduction of the proportion LTFU in tracing studies was only partially explained by re-classification of unknown outcomes. These data suggest that tracing may lead to increased re-engagement of patients in care, rather than just improved classification of unknown outcomes.

Citing Articles

The effect of tracer contact on return to care among adult, "lost to follow-up" patients living with HIV in Zambia: an instrumental variable analysis.

Beres L, Mody A, Sikombe K, Nicholas L, Schwartz S, Eshun-Wilson I J Int AIDS Soc. 2021; 24(12):e25853.

PMID: 34921515 PMC: 8683971. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25853.


Mortality Rate in a Cohort of People Living With HIV in Rural Tanzania After Accounting for Unseen Deaths Among Those Lost to Follow-up.

Vanobberghen F, Weisser M, Kasuga B, Katende A, Battegay M, Tanner M Am J Epidemiol. 2021; 190(2):251-264.

PMID: 33524120 PMC: 7850129. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa176.


Long-term survival of participants in the CENTAUR trial of sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Paganoni S, Hendrix S, Dickson S, Knowlton N, Macklin E, Berry J Muscle Nerve. 2020; 63(1):31-39.

PMID: 33063909 PMC: 7820979. DOI: 10.1002/mus.27091.


Outcomes After Being Lost to Follow-up Differ for Pregnant and Postpartum Women When Compared With the General HIV Treatment Population in Rural South Africa.

Etoori D, Gomez-Olive F, Reniers G, Rice B, Renju J, Kabudula C J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020; 85(2):127-137.

PMID: 32520907 PMC: 7495979. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002413.


Challenges with tracing patients on antiretroviral therapy who are late for clinic appointments in rural South Africa and recommendations for future practice.

Etoori D, Wringe A, Renju J, Kabudula C, Gomez-Olive F, Reniers G Glob Health Action. 2020; 13(1):1755115.

PMID: 32340584 PMC: 7241554. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1755115.


References
1.
OBrien D, Mills C, Hamel C, Ford N, Pottie K . Universal access: the benefits and challenges in bringing integrated HIV care to isolated and conflict affected populations in the Republic of Congo. Confl Health. 2009; 3:1. PMC: 2626580. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1505-3-1. View

2.
Rosen S, Fox M, Gill C . Patient retention in antiretroviral therapy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(10):e298. PMC: 2020494. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040298. View

3.
Brinkhof M, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Egger M . Mortality of patients lost to follow-up in antiretroviral treatment programmes in resource-limited settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2009; 4(6):e5790. PMC: 2686174. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005790. View

4.
Coetzee D, Hildebrand K, Boulle A, Maartens G, Louis F, Labatala V . Outcomes after two years of providing antiretroviral treatment in Khayelitsha, South Africa. AIDS. 2004; 18(6):887-95. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200404090-00006. View

5.
Wools-Kaloustian K, Kimaiyo S, Diero L, Siika A, Sidle J, Yiannoutsos C . Viability and effectiveness of large-scale HIV treatment initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa: experience from western Kenya. AIDS. 2005; 20(1):41-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.aids.0000196177.65551.ea. View