» Articles » PMID: 23419268

Preventive Efficacy of Frontline® Combo and Certifect® Against Dipylidium Caninum Infestation of Cats and Dogs Using a Natural Flea (Ctenocephalides Felis) Infestation Model

Overview
Journal Parasite
Specialty Parasitology
Date 2013 Feb 20
PMID 23419268
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two studies were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of two monthly topical anti-flea products for the prevention of Dipylidium caninum infestations in cats and dogs. A single treatment with Frontline(®) Combo spot-on for cats (fipronil-(S)-methoprene) and two successive monthly treatments of Certifect(®) for dogs (fipronil-amitraz-(S)-methoprene) were assessed for the prevention of D. caninum infestations following weekly challenges of treated cats or dogs with metacestode naturally-infected fleas. The rate of infestations using the model in cats versus dogs explains the choice of a 1-month trial in cats and a 2-month trial in dogs. The experimental flea-infection model resulted in a range of 22-53% of the fleas being infected by Dipylidium cysticercoids. The arithmetic mean flea counts recorded for the untreated cats ranged from 51.2 to 68. The geometric mean flea counts recorded for the Frontline Combo treated cats differed significantly (p < 0.05) from those of the untreated control cats on all assessment days. The arithmetic mean flea counts recorded for the untreated dogs ranged from 166.6 to 238.6. The geometric mean flea counts recorded for the Certifect treated dogs differed significantly (p < 0.001) from those of the untreated group on all assessment days. Frontline Combo treatment on cats provided ≥99.8% persistent anti-flea efficacy throughout the 30-day treatment period. In the dog study, the two Certifect treatments provided ≥97% persistent efficacy throughout the 60-day study. Based on the collection of expelled D. caninum proglottids by cats, 100% (6/6) of the control cats and 0% (0/6) of Frontline Combo treated cats were infested with D. caninum. Frontline Combo spot-on for cats was therefore 100% effective in preventing infection with D. caninum. In dogs, 7 out of the 8 control group dogs (87.5%) produced proglottids following infestation of infected fleas, whereas 0 out of 8 dogs (0%) in the treated group were infected. The infection rates of the two groups were significantly different. The percent effectiveness for the Certifect treatment group for the prevention of D. caninum infection was 100% during this 2-month trial. No treatment-related adverse events were observed in either cats or dogs during these studies.

Citing Articles

Immunoassay for detection of coproantigen in dogs and cats.

Elsemore D, Bezold T, Geng J, Hanna R, Tyrrell P, Beall M J Vet Diagn Invest. 2023; 35(6):671-678.

PMID: 37491878 PMC: 10621563. DOI: 10.1177/10406387231189193.


Efficacy of a novel topical combination of esafoxolaner, eprinomectin and praziquantel in cats against Toxocara cati and Dipylidium caninum.

Knaus M, Baker C, Alva R, Mitchell E, Irwin J, Shukullari E Parasite. 2021; 28:28.

PMID: 33812460 PMC: 8019557. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2021024.


Topical or oral fluralaner efficacy against flea (Ctenocephalides felis) transmission of Dipylidium caninum infection to dogs.

Gopinath D, Meyer L, Smith J, Armstrong R Parasit Vectors. 2018; 11(1):557.

PMID: 30359284 PMC: 6202868. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3140-x.


Praziquantel Resistance in the Zoonotic Cestode .

Chelladurai J, Kifleyohannes T, Scott J, Brewer M Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018; 99(5):1201-1205.

PMID: 30226153 PMC: 6221203. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0533.


Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleas - Part 2. Distinct canine and feline host association with two different Dipylidium caninum genotypes.

Beugnet F, Labuschagne M, de Vos C, Crafford D, Fourie J Parasite. 2018; 25:31.

PMID: 29806593 PMC: 6013090. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2018029.


References
1.
Beugnet F, Franc M . Insecticide and acaricide molecules and/or combinations to prevent pet infestation by ectoparasites. Trends Parasitol. 2012; 28(7):267-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2012.04.004. View

2.
Durden L, Judy T, Martin J, Spedding L . Fleas parasitizing domestic dogs in Georgia, USA: species composition and seasonal abundance. Vet Parasitol. 2005; 130(1-2):157-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.03.016. View

3.
Mircean V, Titilincu A, Vasile C . Prevalence of endoparasites in household cat (Felis catus) populations from Transylvania (Romania) and association with risk factors. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 171(1-2):163-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.03.005. View

4.
Farkas R, Gyurkovszky M, Solymosi N, Beugnet F . Prevalence of flea infestation in dogs and cats in Hungary combined with a survey of owner awareness. Med Vet Entomol. 2009; 23(3):187-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00798.x. View

5.
Ichikawa Y, Beugnet F . Epidemiological survey of anti-flea IgE in dogs in Japan by using an antigen-specific IgE quantitative measurement method. Parasite. 2012; 19(2):173-6. PMC: 3671436. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2012192173. View